What facts, Abbott is a dim-wit, a non economic, a woman in power hater.
Any one with half a brain can see Abbott has his own agenda, and wants to say nothing.
Chemo drugs, if the drugs are only a stop gap to prolong life for a few weeks,,, a lot of expense for what.
Can't single mothers pull their weight once their kids are at kinda etc.
Howard put the retirement age into motion.

Belly You are probably right about Gillard, But she has Abbott's measure. If there was going to be any change, i think it would have happened by now.

579 says,

"Chemo drugs, if the drugs are only a stop gap to prolong life for a few weeks,,, a lot of expense for what."

You vile b**tard! Chemo drugs save lives and give hope to cancer sufferers! Only a miserable socilaist Labor voter like you and Gillard would think like that! You really are the pits!

"Can't single mothers pull their weight once their kids are at kinda etc."

Once again 579, try to put yourself in the shoes of these mothers. You are as callous as that turdiferous Labor Gov't Family Services minister, Jenny Macklin, who says she could live on that sort of money. There are about ten weeks a year that kids are home on holidays even if they are not sick. What does a working mother do with her kids for ten weeks a year? No wonder I despise you lot!

"Howard put the retirement age into motion."

No, he adjusted it to allow senior citizens to work if they wanted to! You do not even understand the consequences of these appalling policies, but you are happy to watch Australians lose their jobs while the Labor Gov't gives $3 Billion to the likes of Gadaffi (thankfully dead now) and socialist tyrants like Robert Mugabe.

Geoffrey Kelley

Geoffrey Kelly, do you have the courage to see your own words as the world does?
Has it escaped your attention or are you just to stubborn to except truth.
63% Of us dislike Abbott, can you except that from polling must be far more than Labor voters.
If you disagree with the above lets stop the debate, it is beyond your understanding.
Hurts do it not? me being as RUDE to you as you tried with me.
Gillard, by miles the worst leader my party ever had, IS IN FRONT OF ABBOTT!.
Truth to harsh?
It is the only measure worth while.
How my rude and combative opponent, can you avoid the fact,Labors two party preferred vote is 48%
So, writing slowly my friend, 25% of the I do not want Abbott vote is other than ALP.
Last your post lives in my book, your view rudeness and all, will come back to haunt.
In an election year, THOSE WHO CAN COUNT not you, will remove Abbott, and in doing so ensure a Liberal victory.
Your posting style asks more questions about you than me.

Belly, I don't give a fig for your stats. There is only one poll that counts.

Have a look at the response from 579 before you call me "rude" or impolite or whatever else you can think of. I abhor your side of politics. One of the main reasons I hate socialists is that you consistently claim the high moral ground. Yet, you write hatefully about Abbott being cruel, and then a vicious little bastard like 579 offers answers like the ones he gave to me defending three appalling Labor initiatives. And Swan still cannot balance his budget!

Read 579's response to my three questions defending those three policy initiatives and then give me your opinion on his answers. If you have the guts, why don't you try and answer my questions.

After reading all the hateful comments about my side of politics made by you and your sort, I really don't care how rude you believe me to be.

Geoffrey Kelley

The difference between what i wrote and what you thought i wrote are two different things. For the kemo drugs i said. If;
The single mothers can pull their weight once their kids are in kinda. Sorry;
I think you will find that Howard put the extention of retirement age in place. Seniors have always had the right to work if they want.
Abbott is still a pig.

GK put it on the table.
Apart from using the word Tory, conservative, and personal insults to Abbott you have no evidence.
Here is the very roots of my recent discontent here.
Hasbeen Individual, Shadow Minister, you, and flocks of recent arrivals, INVITED?
List could be longer, target every Labor voter/supporter.
You then inform me the very evidence of your wrong and rude blast is? not worth reading.
Once a grub targeted me here as PEDOPHILE, I had to wait to get that removed.
BECAUSE SOME WHO I DESPISE in my party are.
There is the challenge.
Right there.
This is a LIBERAL SITE.
While no effort to stop my posts has ever been made, folk like you, in the end unsupported by evidence , or thought,run your hob nailed boots over free speech.
MANY leave, from both sides of the fence, as such as you blacken free speech.
A SIMPLE HONEST TRUTH, NO POSTER HERE EVER TOOK TO MY PARTY MORE THAN ME.
I believe I never ever TARGETED all Liberals, while the extremes will never under stand,including you.
80% of this country has the same wants and values.
Until you get some one who can count to explain 63% will not go in to 47% you need to stop insulting others.
A truth, others can consider, it will be in the interests of ALP voters that Nasty man Abbott remain.
It is unlikely even near every ALP voter is not aware of this.
A chance exists that the 63% is nearer half and half.
Even you will have no difficulty in seeing Gillards unpopularity is more than ALP alone.
Considered opinion is a worth while target.
Not providing evidence you are not well informed.