The thread diverted but ready to stall, may halt.
But it will return time and again, and be diverted yet again.
While insistence that migration worldwide is not in any way integration, it can not be , read Muslim texts.
We will come back, some to flog burning cars, some to plant flowers on the dead body's, to avoid open discussion, not allowed by this creed.
And we western hosts of a people who sometimes hate us, will again be blamed for their actions.
NOTE the constant talk of * The Crusades*
Nearly a full thousand years ago!
Why then should we not forever, and ever, CONDEMN Germany, Japan,England for sending our ancestors here, Spain for the Amarda, it goes on.
Why? Christianity has words like turn the other cheek, not cut the head off!

belly you wrote/quote..""Christianity has words like turn the other cheek, not cut the head off!""

so i went looking..
https://www.google.com/search?q=repulsive+bible+noahtide+law#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=repulsive+exodus&oq=repulsive+exodus&gs_l=serp.12...4557.13810.0.21448.18.16.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.Ylu10OpaKEE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=41e31085700f818&biw=1280&bih=672

and looking
https://www.google.com/search?q=repulsive+bible+noahtide+law#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&tok=WHmtyIREWD3tpq3L-WtWkg&pq=repulsive%20exodus&cp=16&gs_id=2k&xhr=t&q=repulsive+law+in+exodus&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=repulsive+law+in+exodus&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=41e31085700f818&biw=1280&bih=672

and nearly all vidio's
but all that searching brings up
typical union/alp principle?.....policy

''“If you buy a Hebrew servant,
he is to serve you for six years';'

Exodus 21:7 says
it's OK to sell your daughter into slavery.

Exodus 21:10), "if he appoint her as his son's wife,
he shall act towards her ..according to the rights of daughters,"

lol womans rights?
or barbaric xtian noahtide bull

but lets really try reading belly

""21/23..the punishment must match the injury:

a life for a life, 24..an eye for an eye,

a tooth for a tooth,
a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot,

..25a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, a bruise for a bruise..""

turn the other cheek is in the NEW law
the old law ..old test..is saying some really insane things belly

and the torah even worse..like taking a 4 year old as a wife
is ok for a jewish rabbi..is totally kosha..with noahtide law's evolutions..creating perversions in law governance and those claiming a higher standing

we all stand on feet of clay
and its a comfort to know..you can eat bad kids..it says so in the bi bile....you must know that vile seeks to do its vile..so anything we can comeup with[like commandments..will be adulterated

thus see how a warning to the scribe's
to....NOT TO ADULTERATE THESE WORDS

became lol adultery
as in the banning of the fleshy joys
just cause ya[genericly..not specificly..

nbecause we got a ringing in our ears
and a ring in our nose..and we didnt actual read the whole rule book..cause your too busy working..just like it was planned..

by those loving lies...knowable by their works..
not their too many words...or love of other..as THE way to good [god].

Some of your best work, OUG : )

OUG,

We need to be careful which rock we pick up to beat the modern world around the head with - b@stards ! - since some of those Old Testament strictures were adopted, usually in a garbled form , by the Koran: slag those four-thousand-year-old rules and you might be slagging Islam, and that's not permitted on the Left, it's not culturally sensitive enough.

So ..... we're going back, not just a thousand years or so (Crusades ! ptuh ! ptuh !) but four thousand years ? Is there any particular time-limit on any of this ? Why not ten thousand years, and then I can gripe about my Neanderthal ancestors being cruelly picked on by those Cro-Magnon b@stards.

Hey, this is fun :)

OUG,

Just a note: - Neanderthals weren't our "ancestors" - they were our "cousins".

I appreciate, OUG, that you were replying to Belly's comment regarding words in the Koran compared to words in the Bible....therefore, your "going back so far" was in reply to another poster "going back so far". (It seems criticism of straying off core focus in this thread is selectively targeted : )

You're right, Poirot - what about we stick to more or less contemporaneous actions and words and principles - say, over just the last century or so ?

'By their words and actions, roughly about now, shall ye know them.'

That should give us all plenty to complain about :)

Cheers,

Joe