The Forum > General Discussion > Islamic riot
Islamic riot
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 103
- 104
- 105
-
- All
Posted by Banjo, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:30:33 AM
| |
Identify those who punched first, take them all to an isolated island along with the morons who made the video & those who distributed it.
Problem half solved. the second half will depend on the reaction of what transpires after the first half. Btw. it's not as outlandish as you might think at first. There are plenty islands around Australia where this experiment could be tested. A Navy boat full of prototype National Service people could keep an eye on it all. Posted by individual, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:33:34 AM
| |
Remember 1 thing these are the same religion (or lack of it) that are coming on the boats as refugees and most boats have 95% men. I have said before this is possible a deliberate action by Malaysia and Indonesia to undermine Australia.
They can stop most of them coming if they want to by introducing visas for them and return tickets and most important a few questions when they arrive. The know they are not going home after a holiday they are going to Australia. The more that come the weaker Australia gets and more bankrupt. Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:34:12 AM
| |
The police should not have used the dogs they did not clear them fast enough.
INSTEAD I propose the police have a new recruit PIGS (real ones) now if they are real Muslims they will soon run from a pig. Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:11:19 AM
| |
Some are quick to find excuses
Scribblers says: <<The question we should be asking is who stands to gain the most from spreading Islamic unrest, in the ME and around the world, AT THIS TIME?>> Then proceeds to list off the usual suspects: The Republicans, Israel, opponents of the Arab Spring and Copts (the latter is particularly *insensitive* given that the Copts have borne the brunt of Islamic discrimination and terrorism for a millennium). The only ones she misses are the Elders of Zion! The real question here is NOT WHO sought to provoke, but WHY were/are so many easily provoked. Why were so many –who had not even seen the film – so willing to vent their fury on society. One of the corner stones, the defining qualities, of our pluralistic (postmodernist) society is that peoples beliefs are open to challenge. Once again we are being given a wake-up call that in many cases it is not our values that attract people to our shores. Scribblers also gives us a timeline for the lead up to the troubles: <<Months after it was shown once in a Hollywood theater, two film trailers were released on YouTube, in July 2012.>> A more informative timeline might have started like this: 637 the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem 711 - 718 the Muslim conquest of Spain 1453 the Muslim conquest of Constantinople And Scribbler strains credulity by asking : <<The film was written, produced and directed by individuals who all used pseudonyms to hide their real identity. Why? >> WHY! Um, please read up on what befell Salman Rushdie , Dutch film director Theo van Gogh and what was planed for those behind the Danish cartoon Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:22:24 AM
| |
@ Poirot ,
<<I’m going to sit next to Siddhartha and listen to the river>> Alas, mediating peacefully by the river will not save you when the jihadis come … "The Mussalman invaders sacked the Buddhist universities of Nalanda, Vikramshila, Jagaddala, Odantapuri to name only a few. How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the sword of the Muslim invaders has been recorded by the Muslim historians themselves. http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Islamic_Onslaught6.htm But you might be lucky, Poirot, one might spare your life and make you his fourth wife…hmmm, on second thoughts you might be better off with the death option. Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:23:37 AM
|
To be critical of a persons behaviour, a religion or culture is NOT racist. Dont let anyone argue that it is.