Dear Hasbeen,

Well the floor is all yours mate, show us what ya got.

Mind you, csteele, you'd be battling to become more highly opinionated than the magnificent Hasbeen. He assumes he "understands" climate science more thoroughly than the majority of climate scientists (ie, the people who are qualified to interpret data and who have reached consensus on AGW).

Aren't we lucky to have him on board : )

cSteel: I mean we can slap our gums forever but that CO2 is still there and growing.

Yes it is. & that will cause it to warm up a bit. It'll rain, the trees will grow & it'll cool down again. Just like it did in the Little Ice Age. It's called the feedback system. The Earth has been using it for a couple of Billion years.

I see James Lovelock has revoked some of his original findings from his book "Gaia" http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17988492

cSteel: You know of course when a policeman gives false evidence and is found out it often means that all his previous cases are re-examined to see if they are tainted as well.

"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." I guess you'd never get to throw a stone. My posts must really get under your skin. I guess truths hurt. The way you carry on you'd think I personally added the extra sentence. I didn't.

Come Lady's! enjoy the ride.
We are asked to get another leader,as Poirot at least has green blood and not sure about csteel I must take that one.
See it is not Gillard who first warned about climate change, as a matter of known fact she stopped Rudd's little red wagon and took its wheels.
Now a green wagon, and me still pushing it.
However our Kev could not get his plans up at the big betrayal meeting.
And no Australian can take the prize for most of the world being believers and taking action.
Great fun, in time our deniers will look for a rock to hide former opinions under, make it well above high water mark ok?

http://www.braidwoodtimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/sydney-basks-in-record-may-temperature/2552028.aspx
Ah, anyone interested in the link?

http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/article3403669.ece
or say this one?
Lots of charges flying around just thought others opinions may be of interests, and supportive of the threads views