The Forum > General Discussion > Former FBI head 's scathing attacks on FBI & CIA
Former FBI head 's scathing attacks on FBI & CIA
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Pericles, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 1:29:07 PM
| |
ok lets come to a common point we CAN agree on
the lowlifes who did the planning/financing and carrying out of the events of 911.. *are the lowest scum that ever lived. thus we need to know who done what who paid for it and carried this out who failed to prevent or re-act thus we ] need to have an enquiry fully public..full disclosure fully accountable..ASP in the most clear open terms that for govt to delay the FULL inquiry..looks bad implies it is holding secrets...implies that there is something THEY ARE AFRAID OF COMMING OUT a thing so earth shaking that they DARE not look into the true facts dare not hold ALL CONCERNED to account these scum deserve to be outed..so why arnt they why the silence because those who could know...are too afraid to talk or lack the means to talk...but lets agree this looks really bad LET HAVE A FULL AND OPEN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTS no one can deney it neds be open and fully accounting to the scum what dun it..[whoever they are] to not do it honestly and openly will only alow the puss to hide under a huge scab so who do we hold to account for govt not egsamining the facts for govt to activly avoid looking under this scab it just stinks to poopoo with gossip only hides the scum so you mr clever with words put the words right push for a full open hearing of all the facts before we again get caught up in the lies and pr spin with more draconian legislation breat beating and fraud Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 2:27:03 PM
| |
9 minutes of specialist engeneers talking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded Right now, government shills are working hard to trick web sites into running the claim that a passenger jet did not really hit the Pentagon. This is an old intelligence trick called "Poisoning the well", the intentional promotion of lies to blend with an embarrassing truth to discredit it. The government shills are trying to conceal real news stories such as the Israeli Spy Ring and its connections to the attacks on the World Trade Towers. So, we get hoax stories poured onto the net by government propagandists, to be used by the media to attack the credibility of anyone who dares doubt the official story. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ppfinal.html no doudt the hollowing out theory and wikipedia scams...are all part of poisening the well so lets have a full open inquiry into the real facts there really is no excuse good enough to let the REAL killers get away with their TREASON* we could start here http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/bushlie.html or here http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/booker_principal.htm Bush Caught in a Lie About the 9/11 WTC Attacks http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/9-11secretservice.html If Bush really did see an airplane on TV hitting the World Trade Center then he saw that the aircraft was under control at the time, and he saw it before arriving at Booker Elementary because he was en route to the school when the first plane struck WTC 1 - a closed-circuit live feed..to his limo *is the only way he could have seen this impact *on TV. then if you dare we can look at this http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/spyring.php then look at this metal that melted in a LOW temp..smokey fire lol http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/steel.html where the steel went http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/02/nyregion/search-for-clues-towers-collapse-engineers-volunteer-examine-steel-debris-taken.html Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 3:10:34 PM
| |
About your link Belly:
>>The question: Why did the world's most powerful air force fail to intercept any of the four hijacked planes? The answer: Fighter jets failed to intercept the hijacked planes Official reports say: This was a highly unusual multiple hijacking with violence on board, and where the transponder, which provides the exact location of the plane, was turned off or changed.<< SOG response: They had three targets and scrambled for none. >>The question: Why did the Twin Towers collapse so quickly, within their own footprint, after fires on a few floors that lasted only for an hour or two? Official reports say: An extensive inquiry by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fire-proofing. << SOG response: Never before has a steel and concrete “sky scraper” 50 levels or more collapsed to its foundations, there is a first for most things but a treble record breaker is astronomical odds. The Empire state collected a military cargo plane, it stood. Sao Paolo have had horrific fires of duration in their skyscrapers…none fell, in fact never in recorded history has a skyscraper fell to its foundations, unless contrived to do so. Belly it stinks, you don’t smell it? George W was entertaining kindy kids in a school when he was informed of the second strike, it is on video; he stayed and listened to the kids for another 5 minutes. The second report of a strike on the second tower SHOULD have sent the Secret Service into menstruation, an obvious strategy against America unfolded and the President was at a function that was pre announced and common knowledge if you look at the white house press diary, a more obvious and significant target was sitting in front of school kids and the Secret Service just let them all sit there….pull the other one….they knew he was not a target. Belly and Yabby, you chaps obviously read, but you do not think. Posted by sonofgloin, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 4:22:43 PM
| |
No sonofgloin,Yabby and Pericles know the truth,but want to deny the reality.I don't know if Belly/suzeonline have the ability to work it out.
I finally convinced a very intelligent person to look at the evidence this yr.He has degrees in science,computing and business.It was just too impossible for him to even consider such treachery.Blueprint for Truth by Richard Gage did it and he was in total shock.He is a lot less arrogrant these days. Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 6:08:43 PM
| |
2 posters here are easy to read to understand and Even think like.
BBC 20 minutes before it fell? Look got to go enjoy but SOG!? READ BUT DO NOT THINK? enjoy Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 6:19:27 PM
|
>>How did the BBC know it would collapse in 20 minutes? Controlled Demoliton perhaps?<<
Given the traditional image of the BBC's political bias - wussy, soft-left, brown-cardigan-and-suede-shoes vegetarians - I doubt if they'd be able to keep a "sooper-seekrit" like this one for more than fifteen seconds. Especially as it involves their traditional enemies, the corporate capitalist war-mongers.
I'd still like Arjay to tell us which of the many theories he subscribes to. Only then might he be able to attempt to put the picture together as to how it was done, which is the elephant in his conspiracy-room that he hates being asked about.
But of course, there was always Rumsfeld's 10th September speech, that "proves" that it was funded by trillions of missing dollars from the Defense Budget... here, I'll save him the trouble of selectively quoting from it:
http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=430
I've lost count of how many times we have been around this particular track - it used to annoy me slightly that anyone would think that it's really neat to propagate this rubbish. Now I just find it mildly amusing. Tinged with a little sadness, that someone chooses to waste all those brain cells on such nonsense.
But as you point out, everyone has to have a hobby.