Sonofgloin,yes I'm fully aware if the scientific facts of 911 and Larry Silverstein.The 10th anniversary of 911 is just a couple of weeks away and most think that it was so long ago that is does not matter.They don't however realise loss of legal freedoms we have given away in pursuit of this contrived enemy.Howard's sedition Laws do much the same as Bush's Patriot Act and yet we continue as if all will be OK.

It's like finding a paedophile in your family and pretending that all is OK even while family members are being abused.People just pretend that it is not happening.

Judging by the reaction to Kevin Bracken in Parliament a few months ago,I think most of them know.It is just too big to acknowledge since they don't have the answers.

If you go to http://patriotsquestion911.com/ you will see hundreds of credible leaders,entertainers,engineers,professionals,scientists etc all around the planet raising legitimate questions,yet the media has a stranglehold on the information.

I think Pelican is just representative of most attidues.It just seems too incredible to be true.That's exactly why they did it.

"I think Pelican is just representative of most attidues.It just seems too incredible to be true.That's exactly why they did it.'

Well it does sound incredible. But it's incredulity should not be presented as evidence for either the allegations being true or false. Many things that have happened throughout time which have been incredible and there is something in the old adage - 'truth is stranger than fiction'. I hold no illusions about the extent to which corruption can stem or whose interests they might protect, I just don't happen to buy into the 'science' or logic of some 9/11 theories.

My assessments and conclusions might certainly be wrong. And even if further truths emerge there will always be those who will doubt the integrity of the material presented either way.

It is sometimes as difficult to prove something is NOT a conspiracy as it is to prove something IS a conspiracy.

However, your subject - the CIA-mafia link has certainly been established beyond a reasonable doubt in a number of documents, investigative reporting and other revelations over the last few decades.

Pelican,Do yourself a favour and see http://www.ae911truth.org/ View the scientific forensic evidence.I have met Richard Gage the founder along with Prof Steven Jones and Prof Neils Harrit who has conclusive proof of nano thermite being used.

Once people with the intelligence view the scientific evidence,there is only one conclusion they arrive at.It was a controlled demolition and planes were not responsible for the collapse of any of the 3 towers that fell on 11/9/2001.

Amazingly, Arjay, most people who watch a tragedy unfolding, live, on TV, can make their own minds up about what happened.
As far as I could see, the planes hit the towers before there was any explosions, so that is enough for me.
All these mad 'conspiracy theories' have been just that...mad theories.

People like to answer their own questions with their own agenda to permit their self perceived realities.

Suzanneonline the evidence is overwhelming.No plane hit WTC7 which was half the height of the towers.Even Larry Silverstein who sonofgloin makes reference to,said he had to pull it.Larry some weeks before 911 took over the leases and insured each building separately against terrorism and made a fortune.

WTC 7 came down at freefall speeds for 3 secs of it descent.This is impossible for any building to come down uniformly and at 9.8m per sec like dropping a rock from a cliff.Fire in buildings cause non uniform damage and they fall over.Fire has never since or before 911 brought down steel concrete reinforced buildings.

Then we have the proof of nano thermite which acts as an explosive as well as an incendiary.Neils Harrit and his team of 9 international scientists produced a peer reviewed paper which has not been disputed let alone acknowleged by Govt authorities.

The anomolies gone on and on yet we continue to deny the reality at our peril.