online suzie
im not sure if you watch football
but guess what...[those adverts you see on the field
arnt really there..clever computer programers insert them..INTO the footage]

no doudt you have seen living dinosaurs on tv
but guess what...they are extinct*
[and despite you watching time travel..this too is only in the movies]

recently they have found live footage
that clearly records the explosions[3 seconds before the building falls down]

there are also witness reports
that a plane overflew the pentigon
and a missile was sent in[not a plane]

but hey lets ignore all that
tell me what plane hit building 7?

we have had bigger planes hit smaller steel frame buildings
and hotter buigger fire[yet in all histry only 3 steel frame buildings has EVER fallen into its own footprint[all on 911
all at the same place]

the list of evidence is substantial
but hey..you saw it really happen...on tv..[lol]

thats great for you
seeing is believing

well it used to be believable
but times have changed

*All these mad 'conspiracy theories' have been just that...mad theories.*

Suze, you are of course quite correct. But some people, it seems
it is just how their brain is wired, need their daily fix of
conspiracy to be content with the world. Ah well, it keeps them
off the streets :)

I went through Building 7 with Arjay, ages ago. This thing had
been built on top of a power station, in the era of lightweight
design, when engineers were pushing the limits. Not too much
concrete in there, more like lots of cladding, unlike other buildings
which have concrete columns which carry the load. Then they added
a number of stories on top of it later, for which it was never
designed. Then they hollowed out the interior structure of a number
of floors, to suit one of the tenants.

But all this is ignored. But apparently it wasn't really bin Laden
killed recently either in Pakistan, according to Arjay. Despite
his family and even Al Queda saying that it was.

Hey, it keeps Arjay busy, everyone needs a hobby and as such its
all pretty harmless I guess.

Yabby you obfuscate yet again.WTC7 was built better than the brick sh#thouse.It housed the FBI,CIA and the Enron criminals who all needed to destroy evidenece.

Yabby ,you won't debate the scientifc facts because you will lose hands down.Attack the messenger is the ruse of a deceptive and feeble intellect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC_Building_7

There you go Arjay, all public information, quite easy to read
for anyone interested.

Everything I claimed is spot on. I have a good memory :)

The new WTC, since built, has a reinforced concrete core, unlike
the old one, which was basically steel and cladding, with 3 floors
hollowed out to suit Salomon Smith Barney, who were by far the
largest tenants.

But keep amusing yourself Arjay, it keeps you busy. Fair enough.

Even a house of cards Yabby cannot come down at freefalls speeds because the collapsing structure still offers some resistance to gravity.WTC7 had many steel columns that had to be compromised in rapid synchronisation to to achieve this effect.NIST said that there was no evidence of explosives and later admitted they did not look for them.As Richard Gage said ,"The evidence of explosives was not hard to find." They were then accused to putting explosives in the samples.It was called nano thermite and only the US military had the capacity to produce this high tech explosive.It cannot be made in normal labs.

We see evidence of fire fighters saying run for your lives she's going to blow, then a countdown is heard ,3,2,1. A British reporter announces the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it actually happens and right at that time we see WTC 7 in the background still standing.How did she know?

WTC 7 was supposed to come down in the dust and confusion of the Twin Towers.For some reason the demo failed.Larry Silverstein then announces that,"We had to pull it." Larry made his biggest error here since he thought that a building could be wired for demolition in a few hours.It takes weeks to wire a building up any building for demo.

How do you explain the molten iron when the worst office fires will only burn to half the melting point of steel.Why was the evidence hastily sent to China? Why was NORAD stood down.Why were the Bin Laden they only ones on a plane flying back to Saudi Arabia? Why did Geroge Bush remain for 20 minutes reading to the children in the class after he learned that the USA was under attack? He was putting himself and the children in danger by remaining there? How could a whispers give him the total story? I Would have moved to a back room and asked for more detail.

The Mossad agents who were captured filming and celebrating the collapses were later released and when questioned said,"Our purpose was TO DOCUMENT THE EVENT."How did they know?

anyone can edit or write a wiki
that in itself proves nothing

[heck we got spin merchants in the media
and certainly those who did do the attack
[and ensure no formal investigation into it]..are clever enought to write....their spin..'simple'..for any simpleton to accept as true..

the nano particulate[found in the dust]..was thermite
that isnt an explosive..but a high tempreture substance..designed to cut through even the hardest steel..its not available to the likes of even bin larden

lest we forget he was from south arabia
and working for cia[and lets look at 17 of the 19 terrorists from south arabia]...many of the names of who..are found to be still alive

of course bin larden..was in afganistan
not usa..or iraq..which raises..of why atack that sadman insane..in iraq...[the one who's dopple ganger [with crooked teeth]..was hanged
as the real sadman[again a cia operative..]...had perfect teeth.

the wikipedia isnt an proof
buildingh 7 did hold all the evidence ogf enron fraud
as well as a substtantial reserve of gold[that was never recoverd]

the steel...wasnt investigated..in fact was immediatly sent to china to remelt it[photo's of some of the beams..show it was cut [melted]much like thermite..and certainly that took a higher temp..than a slow burning smokey fire

the proper investigation would have saved a motza
if a contributing cause like 'hollowing' out had occured
even that fact alone sounds suss[as if engeneers would condone taking oiut main supports]..that alone would indicate complicity..[or intent]

if things dont pass the logic test
chances are you been conned again

where there is smoke there is fire