Belly's link does explain some of those points raised by Arjay and SOG.

Whatever view one takes we all tend to find 'evidence' that suits our own position, but there are probably a number of valid questions to be asked.

Much of the criticism after 9/11 came from a lack of cooperation and sharing of information between the various intelligence and law enforcement agencies that would have produced more 'pieces of the puzzle'. These non-sharing arrangements are typical of some bureaucratic empire builders and self appointed kingpins. Not that I am cynical or anything. :)

sonofgloin,There is a real agenda here of cover up.Richard Gage in Blueprint for Truth methodically went through the scientific method for all 3 towers and proved conclusively that explosives had to be used to create such a result.http//www.ae911truth.org/

With the neo-con lunatics behind this coup,seeing Adolph Hitler as their role model,the alarm bells should be ringing far and wide.Some of these nutters want the world pop reduced to half a billion or removing 11 out of 12 people from this planet.

Zibigniew Brezezinski last year," In the past it was easier to control a million people than kill them.Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than control them." He was the chief foreign policy advisor to Jimmy Carter and still advises Obama today and influences world opinion.

If NATO goes into Syria,this will begin WW3 and they don't care how many are killed on both sides,since the banksters like always will finance both sides.

Sonofgloin, perhaps you should read the link that I posted, a bit
more closely. WTC 7 covered nearly an acre. In the basement were
power stations with a heap of diesel oil. Construction was a bit
like a meccano set, with concrete floors and cladding, not part of
the structural strength in other words, but lots of weight.

Pull out the support of the centre columns over 1 acre with all that
concrete weight, what do you think will happen? Collapse will be
inward, not outward, as things going down pull the rest inward, not
outward.

But of course the building did not just come down, like your explosive
claim. Fires were raging for hours. Three hours before final
collapse, one side started buckling and an eventual collapse was
expected. Just under a minute before the final collapse, part of
the insides could be seen collapsing. Inside structural failure, add
all that weight from the top and steel weak from heat (steel loses 90% of its strength as you heat it up) and voila, eventually
the whole lot gives. Nothing remarkable in that.

But of course Pericles asks the most pertinent question of all.
Such a huge conspiracy and not a single leak? Not a single person
who wants to sell the story of the century to the press? Not even
the BBC journalist who Arjay claims knew ahead of time?

The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
"I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted..not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government ...

It will become public at some point
when it's turned over to the archives,
but that's 20 or 30 years from now" - Senator Bob Graham. (34)

If..the sovereign foreign government
mentioned by Senator Graham..was an enemy/of the United States the "compelling evidence"..would SHOUL/not be kept secret..for 20+ years.

How Did the WTC Fires..Burn for Months?

An ignored point..in the BBC's Conspiracy/files
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_fires_911.html

At Least 7
of the 9/11 Hijackers..*are Still Alive*

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
In September 2002,[FBI Director Robert Mueller]
told CNN twice..that there is "no legal proof
to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers."..[Insight]

So,one fact is apparent.
If those who hijacked the 9/11 airplanes were using stolen identities,*[now who regularilly..*does that?]..lol..

then we don't know..who they were
or who they worked for...We can't...It's impossible.
[mossad runs cia]

An ignored point..in the BBC's Conspiracy/files

Shaped Charges and the World Trade Center Collapses

Why were high velocity explosives
detonating..in the vicinity of the World Trade Center?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_charges.html
An ignored point/in the BBC's Conspiracy files

9/11 Firefighters: Bombs and Explosions in the WTC
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_firefighters.html

How could an aircraft impact at floors 78+ of WTC 2
cause numerous large explosions..*at the base of the building?

An ignored point
so many sad ignored points

ok how about the truss theory
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/trusstheory.html

The transmissions document that only isolated pockets of fire were reported by the firefighters, so where was the all-consuming inferno?

THAT MELTED HIGH GRADE US STEEL!
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc2_firefighters.html

Also of note is the fact that these transmissions
were made..seconds before WTC 2's collapse.

There were supposedly massive structural failings
occurring in this section of the building..at this time..

yet no media/mention is made of this.

or this
http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2009/09/911truth-blind-us-corporate-media.html

or this
http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2010/01/obama-advisor-sunsteins-conspiracy.html

supose you wont even dare read this
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/08/operation-false-flag-modern-primer.html

how about this guy
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/911-fema-videographer-at

here is his photo's
http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/new-pics-911-fema

heck so much evidence
and NO REASON..FOR ANY INQUIRY?

lol

Let's put paid to all the lies and nonsense regards WTC 7.It's collapse was announced on the BBC 20 min before it happened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s It is announced as the Salamen Bros Building Collapse.Jane Stanley is reporting live and just out of the window behind her she confirms the collapse of WTC 7 the Salamen Bros Building.To her right we see WTC 7 still standing.Jane obiviously did not know what WTC 7 looked like.How did the BBC know it would collapse in 20 minutes? Controlled Demoliton perhaps?

*How did the BBC know it would collapse in 20 minutes? Controlled Demoliton perhaps?*

Lol Arjay, so now the BBC is seemingly involved in this conspiracy
too? Still no leaks?

The journalist was new in town, had just arrived. The place is
in total chaos, including media reports. WTC was predicted to
collapse three hours earlier, once the side wall started buckling.

So now based on the fact of a press cock up between will soon
collapse and has collapsed already, you see conspiracy!

Given the building in the background, its clearly a stuff up,
hardly an intelligent conspiracy, with thousands sworm to silence,
not one who has ever divulged the truth.

But it keeps you occupied, everyone needs a hobby.