The Forum > General Discussion > A Tiger In Bed?
A Tiger In Bed?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 4:51:22 PM
| |
Dear Belly,
Read my post again - I was talking about Tiger's sponsors - (not his love of the game). Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 5:51:44 PM
| |
To all the old boys rushing in to use Tiger as a male victim poster boy for all these violent women bashing men wholeheartedly out there in the world, we don't even have confirmation that he was actually bashed by his wife yet do we?
All we have proof of is a car accident and some head injuries, that may well have been caused in the accident couldn't it? Again, no one, least of all me, condones any violence at all. I mentioned the riches these two have amassed only because if they weren't rich and famous, no one would even hear about their alleged disputes would they? We also don't know if he actually cheated on his wife either, although reports today that the wife has moved out of home doesn't sound too good. Maybe she was moved out to protect Tiger? :) Posted by suzeonline, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 10:55:19 PM
| |
pelican, "Most men are scrubbers - out for as much sex they can get - aren't they? Or am I generalising."
The stereotype might have truth for some men, but to apply it to all men would be as unfair as saying that all women are scrubbers because of the behaviour of Pumas and Cougars. The BBC survey I linked to earlier challenged the myth that men are always the love rats who don't have 'commitment' and stray. Apparently just as many women in serious relationships like a bit on the side as well. As said in the article, it takes two to tango. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/591383.stm Posted by Cornflower, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 11:01:39 PM
| |
Oh Suze, I remember using that very same argument with the Greg Bird case and many other cases, bringing on cries of 'you're excusing violence','be a man and denounce this guy', 'where is your empathy'.
You certainly show zero 'empathy' for Tiger even if it is true his wife attacked him with a golf club. You may not 'condone' the violence, but you really don't show any empathy or outrage, which is the accusation levelled at all those nasty 'misogynists' on any gender war thread to do with NRL cases and such when they talk about what is 'proven'. Posted by Houellebecq, Thursday, 10 December 2009 7:52:28 AM
| |
Houellebecq: Well I've never seen you even say you don't condone some violent act against a woman. Quite the opposite; you actively minimize; discount and laugh at it like a delirious juvenile pulling wings off flies.
That you can say you "laughed my ass off" at any aspect of Ms. Brimble's death is disturbing and it actually made me sad. Whatever POV one takes about the culpability of people who were involved in that event; she was a living person for whom others are grieving. Nobody deserves the indignities she suffered as she died. Btw: As Sharkfin noted, please at least show Ms. Brimble the minimum of respect that she was denied at her death by referring to her as MRS Brimble; Ms Brimble or Diane Brimble. Our previous discussion: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=9684&page=8 Summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Dianne_Brimble Detailed account with witness testimony: http://www.cruisebruise.com/Dianne_Brimble.html Also, please don't put words in my mouth. I can make enough controversial statements on my own account without you fantasizing things I haven't said, but which suit your uninformed, preconceived notions of a feminist perspective. Posted by Pynchme, Thursday, 10 December 2009 8:57:03 AM
|
Tiger handles his clubs very well, all of them.
And often those who play with him seek out his company, money?
Foxy it is the joy of the game that brings us to play not cash.
ten? gee in truth it would be more would it not?
Great round again tiger thank the caddy's, now it may be time for the tips.