The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Stop the War Mongering !

Stop the War Mongering !

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
Isn't it amazing that all Pericles,stg and Col Rouge can offer is character assassination by alluding to conspiracy mental dis-order, without refuting the scientific evidence.Who has the real credibility?

How is it possible for buildings to collapse at the free speed of gravity like a feather on the moon,when the opposing forces of the building structure slows dramatically both it's acceleration and speed.Show me the scientific evidence to back your arguments you intellectual cowards.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 9:24:43 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay, the evidence is there for all to see.

>>Isn't it amazing that all Pericles,stg and Col Rouge can offer is character assassination by alluding to conspiracy mental dis-order<<

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/user.asp?id=4915&show=history

Sifting through that load of rubble can lead to only one conclusion, I'm afraid.

Have a great day.
Posted by Pericles, Thursday, 1 October 2009 7:56:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay “How is it possible for buildings to collapse at the free speed of gravity like a feather on the moon,when the opposing forces of the building structure slows dramatically both it's acceleration and speed.Show me the scientific evidence to back your arguments you intellectual cowards.

I saw the video footage live on TV.

The plane hit the building about ¾ up its height

There was then a delay, before the effects of

1 metal vaporization of the structure on the impact levels and
2 the combined weight of the upper levels

collapsed downward,

3 with an increasing weight and forces of momentum, assisted by gravity,

they crushed the lower levels, just like a moving truck hitting a stationary vehicle (only more so).

And I bet no one ever did a computer model of what would happen if those towers were hit, beforehand.

Want to call me a coward.. go ahead.. but speaking personally, I think those who seek some excitement in their lives by believing conspiracy theories should first consult with their nearest pixie ring.

Now back to those pesky bumble bees… the ratio of their wing area to body mass means they just can’t fly… but they do!

Its another conspiracy!
Posted by Col Rouge, Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:25:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
col/quote..<<I...saw..The plane hit the building..about ¾ up its height>>visit http://digg.com/lbv.php?id=15290139&ord=1..as it is usually censord try these search options
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=911+impact+annotomy&search_type=&aq=f

..see the planes hit..near floors..95/96..of a 110 story buildings..hardly the 75th floor as your saying

<<There was then a delay>>...because the structure..wasnt mortally broken...these 3 buildings...are the ONLY ones..EVER...to collapse..there have burned longer/hotter fires/and been bigger planes hit buildings..to no colkapsing/afect,...

the only buildings ever to get..specific insurance under act of terror[via isreal insurance..who paid out immediatly..to a fellow non-goy

the buildings..were under order..to remove asbestos[two billion/plus..thus he got a 99 year lease..for near nothing...he still retains the lease..over the new improved..[asbestos free...lol..]..buildings

<<metal vaporization>>>needs way hotter temps..than smouldering office furnature

<<the combined weight of the upper levels>>..was fully supported FROM THE OUTSIDE..where no fire was...the inside hit..where the cranes[4] were built on..thus were special; hardened...thicker/stronger..that its thicker than armour plate[and was completly undamaged]...

under your presumed weakend point..[on one corner..yet the building didnt lean...it..[all of it failed..[was made to fail..at the same time

how is via busche's brother..who ran security in the building..noting busches vp[cheeney]..stood down the airforce..that normally would respond..an act of high treason..a power..he only used one time...lol..the day we got..911...lol

<<with an increasing..weight and forces of momentum,>>presuming your thinking pancake afect..[of all the floors pancaking down...thing is the main steelframe core STILL STOOD/..resisting the fall beyond ''freefall''..ie no resistance..as metal sheers..[but they smelted the metal..so no one can prove shear affect..or blast melt

<<assisted by gravity,..they>>>who is they...lol

<<they crushed the lower levels,>>.collapsed..via shearing off the main supports symoultainiously...mate..it hit..one..corner..get it?

http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=14&MMN_position=20:20

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&rls=MEDA%2CMEDA%3A2008-36%2CMEDA%3Aen-GB&q=911+impact+floors+height&btnG=Search&meta=
http://www.google.com.au/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=gd&q=911+impact+height&hl=en-GB&rls=MEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB

you have only opinion col
rebut facts mate

your allowing faulse memory..to misslead you and others
revieuw arjays facts mate...

just as bummble-bees fly
so might pigs

or steel/frame buildings collapse..lol

but histry recordes..only 3....ever..colapsed..

all on..one day...

why is that day special..col?

because we needed..to be able to have govt change laws..so we all become terrorists...that govt can tort-ure

we are put on special lists
lists mate...

just like the commies/natzies..

if your not on one..your a sheeple...mindless drones...opinating...not confirming/validating/nor rebutting/dis-proving/testing/questioning
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 1 October 2009 1:16:48 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay,

"Show me the scientific evidence to back your arguments you intellectual cowards."

*shakes head* You just cut and pasted someone elses opinion, Arjay.
Posted by StG, Thursday, 1 October 2009 1:54:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Not one point refuted successfully.Just general lame explanations that do not confront the reality.

No building can collapse at the freefall speed of gravity without some serious external force destroying it's integrety.Gravity and the momentum of the building are not enough.The energy put into pancaking[the official theory] must slow the speed of collapse to far less than free fall speeds.That is a mathematica/physics fact.Building 7 186mtall coame down in 6.5 sec or an average speed of 28m/sec or 103 km per hr.Now that's incredible.

Perhaps god came in for that moment and suspended the laws of physics so George Bush could have his day in the sun.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 1 October 2009 5:09:51 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy