Dear Antonios,

You don't know me that well to make
those kind of assumptions about me.
I know that English is not your first
language - and many people on OLO
overlook your personal insults most of
the time - as do I. You have no idea of
what my relationship with my husband is -
or what I do or don't do as far as
human rights are concerned. You simply
don't know me that well.

I don't call you a "blow hard,"
or a big "wind-bag," (all talk and no action) -
so I'd appreciate it if you'd lay off the name
calling.

I know you probably mean well.

FAKE-ING IT OUT

Scientists Debunk UN “Global Warming”
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monthly_report/sppi_monthly_co2_report_july.html
Christopher Monckton
SPPI Monthly
August 25, 2009

UN exaggerated warming 6-fold: the scare is over

SPPI’s authoritative Monthly CO2 Report for July 2009 announces the publication of a major paper by Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, demonstrating by direct measurement that outgoing long-wave radiation is escaping to space far faster than the UN predicts, showing that the UN has exaggerated global warming 6-fold.Report, page 3.

Lindzen’s paper on outgoing long-wave radiation shows the “global warming” scare is over. Thanks to recent peer reviewed papers that have not been mentioned in the mainstream news media, we now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little effect on the climate. Page 3.

The IPCC assumes CO2 concentration will reach 836 ppmv by 2100, but, for almost eight years, CO2 concentration has headed straight for only 570 ppmv by 2100. This alone halves all of the IPCC’s temperature projections. Pages 5-6.

Since 1980 temperature has risen at only 2.5 °F (1.5 °C)/century, not the 7 F° (3.9 C°) the IPCC imagines. Pages 7-9.

Sea level rose just 8 inches in the 20th century and has been rising at just 1 ft/century since 1993. Sea level has scarcely risen since 2006. Also, Pacific atolls are not being drowned by the sea, as some have suggested. Pages 10-12.

Arctic sea-ice extent is about the same as it has been at this time of year in the past decade. In the Antarctic, sea ice extent – on a 30-year rising trend – reached a record high in 2007. Global sea ice extent shows little trend for 30 years. Pages 13-15.
http://www.infowars.com/invisible-empire-a-new-world-order-official-trailer/
Read entire article
http://www.infowars.com/true-deleveraging-has-not-begun-yet-because-losses-of-financial-institutions-have-been-socialized/
http://www.infowars.com/judge-orders-fed-to-disclose-who-received-bailout-trillions/
http://www.infowars.com/where-is-the-anti-war-movement-in-the-age-of-obama/
http://www.infowars.com/hundreds-of-911-first-responders-die-of-cancer/
http://www.infowars.com/one-crime-solved-for-every-1000-cctv-cameras/
http://www.infowars.com/feds-cracking-down-on-garage-sales/
http://www.infowars.com/sibel-edmonds-deposition-deep-corruption-beneath-the-surface/
http://www.infowars.com/911-mind-swell/
http://www.infowars.com/brookings-experts-admit-stimulus-a-bust/
Who is funding the Afghan Taliban? You don’t want to know
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=3877

Foxy
The problem with you is that you have written very often on the forum and people trust and respect you, but if you pass this kind of messeges then there is a problem!
My talk is an action, I use this forum to send some messeges and my messeges are very clear BE STRAIT AND HONEST, PREPARE TO FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS! TRUST CHARACTERS, MORAL CODES, NOT EMPTY WORDS.
People are smarter than we think and they have strong memory.
Antonios Symeonakis
Adelaide

TPP” Well see that is what I admire about you – brutal honesty. But don’t forget the kids, can’t be running around going “well that drawing is just bloody awful throw it in the bin immediately”.”

Yes being honest with tact is different to being honest without tact.

To the kids we say “nice effort but”…. Followed by a list of constructive criticisms and maybe conditioned with a friendly hug.

Pelican “On another tangent, manners might be seen as a form of fakery,……. Personally, I think one can possess manners and still be honest”

Disagree Pelican, manners distinguish the refined from the trailer park trash…. I open doors for ladies, wait for them to sit, generally treat people with respect (unless they decide to take a shot at me).

Being “constructively critical” is neither rude nor disrespectful….

UOG “i had a workmate once...arrived in a suit/left in a suit...but worked in overall;s,,,for all anyone knew he was a lawyer...”

I get your drift but maybe he inherited a lot of suits from someone.

I usually wear business casual these days, but sometimes a suit, depending on the audience but that is not “fakery” that is “selling”.

The best description of fakery I know is an English saying “fur coat and no knickers”

someone showing off their “finery” but foregoing the basics.

Ah AGW is a big fake… always has been and will be… it as an attempt by UN bureaucrats to claim significance for themselves by perpetrating the biggest widescale fraud which will, ultimately cost over 1,000 time more than the Bernard Madoff scam.

ASymeonakis “The problem with you ….. “

I find judgmental responses fake.

They rely on a knowledge which is in fact absent and an entitlement to criticism which is unsupportable in practice.

Like Foxy said “You don't know me that well to make
those kind of assumptions about me.”

Doubtless you see failings/problems with my posts from time to time but if you ever passed a line like that to me,

I would (politely) “tear you out an extra orifice”, figuratively speaking, in my posts

Col Rouge
In the forum I am interested for few simple things
1. Writers messeges to readers
2. Writers honesty.
Usualy there is a connection between messeges and honesty but some time this connection is not very visible.
Honesty have to do with the character, the moral code, the core values of the writer.
The messeges depend on many factors and their motivations or goals are not clear, but with some experiences we can see their results.
I am interested primarly for characters, moral codes, core values of the writer and less for their messeges but in some cases the writers and their messeges play an important role to readers. My responses dependes on the effects or results on the readers and not the motivations of the writers, I do not know their motivations.
In the forum I have my own goals, if I think a post damaged my goals, my ideas, I fight to minimize the impact of the messege to readers.
If I found in a messege an opportunity to promote my ideas I also will fight this messege.
Generaly I am fix in many issues as migrants rights, women rights, democracy, human rights etc.
YES I USE THIS FORUM OR ANY FORUM TO PROMOTE MY IDEAS AND I AM READY TO FIGHT AGAINST ANY POST OR WRITER WHO PROMOTE OPPOSITE IDEAS.
Every one does it, simple I do not hide my self back of my fingers.

Antonios Symeonakis
Adelaide

Antonios Symeonakis QUOTE>>>>please explain?..<<..if I found in a messege..an opportunity to promote my ideas...I also will fight this messege....>>here is your oppertuinity

...<<<..Generaly I am fix <<<...gebnerally my mind is fixed on??...<<<..in many issues ]..>>SUCH <<..as migrants rights>>>

ok so what about migrant rights
we treat them the same as the abo's
because their all ab-origonal...from somewhere

ok we change their names to make them english...but then fill their minds with wrong ideas...when imagrants run home their outcast thus oftenn return to foreign lands [for thec kids]]

we are sytolen generation as well[we lost our links to culture...were stolen generations TOO...we only know our mother and father [no kin skin groups to be seen

<<,women rights,>>>how about that circumsizing of woman so the dont get pleasure and stay loyal to their tyrant of a husband...for honour?

<<..democracy,>>>demon-mock-craz-y,...de-moc-rats....de-mockery,..

<<..human rights etc.>>.humans are mainly wrong
the been fed propagandased lies and deceptions [re 911...re gulf of tonkin..re pearlharbour...and so much more that mocks the reality of human rights....how to enforce them under tyrany?

<<YES I USE THIS FORUM OR ANY FORUM TO PROMOTE MY IDEAS AND I AM READY TO FIGHT AGAINST ANY POST OR WRITER WHO PROMOTE OPPOSITE IDEAS.
Every one does it,simple I do not hide my self>>>>.i was understanding you perfect
but then you lost me hear...<<< back of my fingers.>>>?