Public speculation that a financial institution is experiencing liquidity shortfalls...which would be a natural inference from having tapped emergency funds..has caused bank customers to withdraw deposits,..

..counterparties to make collateral calls..and lenders to accelerate loan repayment..or refuse to make new loans.

When an institution’s customers flee..and its credit dries up the institution may suffer severe capital..and liquidity strains leaving it in a weakened competitive position...

Pardon me if I am a broken record here,..but would rumors not spread much less..if there was more transparency,..if investors and other financial intermediaries were fully aware of the conditions of their counterparties,

if banks did not have to cover..their billions in reserve losses..by pretending they are viable..and essentially..being constant wards of the state?

The Banks’..racketeering...has gone on for far too long.

And yet,it does not stop:
the conclusion from the banks’..letter:

In sum,..our experience differs from the factual conclusions the Court appears to have reached..about the nature of competition in the banking industry:

•..The competitive harm to institutions that are publicized as needing emergency funding is not “speculative,”...but demonstrated by the recent multiple failures of financial institutions..whenever information about their funding difficulty..has been disclosed.

•The disclosure does not involve mere..“embarassing publicity”..but information that could result..in the immediate demise of an..[a bad]..institution.

•The disclosure..would not merely..“stigmatize..“the institution or make it “look weak,”.....but goes to its very viability...[ok its not viable...get it?}

•The disclosure of accessing emergency funding#..is not an..“inherent risk”..of market participation,...but an extraordinary risk in extraordinary circumstances...[wrought by treason]

•Competitors can use..the disclosure to advertise..or publicize..that they are financial stronger..because they don’t need emergency funding....[well didnt they?]


In a nutshell..the banks want their complete opacity cake..and eat it too,...or else,

the racket goes,on..the transparency that will somehow promote massive rumor mongering...will again destroy capitalism.[reveal its govt largess]

In the meantime,..the Ken Lewises of the world..can continue touting how stable their businesses,,are..based on optimistic future projections,..while implicitly,...they continue to survive...merely thanks to the cash granted them by your,....taxpayers.

full filling
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/Clearinghouse_Decl.pdf

TPP

<< A fake silence is the worst kind for me to practice. >>

My guess, Piper, and with the greatest of respect and admiration, is that you might find any kind of silence rather a challenge! :)

Foxy, the Pied Piper, it doesn't get more fake than a male using
women's rights and incessant emails to control women.

did anybody notice the indigenous model of management proposed
yesterday with dual male and female leaders and equal numbers of
male and female representatives ... maybe so women and men don't
have to fake being each other anymore?

Fractelle,
Are you joking? I never said it but that:
1. I started the flert not The Pied Piper, she was innocent.
2. My goals of cause was very clear, permanent partner, wife and I wrote it from my first emails. "I will give my credit card and home keys, when you are ready take your children and come to Adelaide" Very honest.
3. She is an honest and fair person, in her few last posts she is not very fair with me but I understand that.
4. The Pied Piper is very smart womam , the average IQ for Australians is 98, her IQ is more than I15.
5. She has right about my emails, I tried to speed up the whole procces.
6. I will be the last one who will blame The Pied Piper, she a nice human.
7. Belly wrote something about The Pied Piper personaly I have a good idea for her, probably her weakness are less and smaller than mine.
8. It is not fair and logical, for anyone to blame The Pied Piper, I tried and failed, this is part of life's games.
9. For sure I wish her happines and the best.
Antonios Symeonakis
Adelaide

Antonios I'm surprised that you are game to stick your head up around here at the moment. You really do need to learn to comprehend what people are actually saying. Amongst other things Fractelle did not criticise Pied Piper at all.

- Your behaviour in attempting to break up a marriage is disgusting.
- Your reported inclusion of sexual content into emails to someone who you have not met (and where there is no clear approval for that) is disgusting.
- Your lack of regard for Pied Piper and her family is disgusting.
- Your lack of regard for Pied Pipers passion for the care of children is disgusting in someone who claimed to love her.

If this is an example of the way you conduct yourself with others seek professional help urgently.

I'm left wondering how many of those you have bullied with claims of discrimination over the years were just innocent people who you chose to misunderstand because it suited what you wanted.

By the way why are you operating two accounts on OLO, I see posts on the same day's from ASymeonakis (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/user.asp?id=49766)and AnSymeonakis (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/user.asp?id=54996)?

R0bert

Bronwyn, hubby is sitting opposite me doing a work from home thing and mumbling stuff at his laptop with the odd swear word thrown in. He’s been rather focused and trying to concentrate as 5 small children keep running squealing through the house. At the risk of distracting him further I read out your post.

You gave him his first laugh of the day. If you were here he would probably hug you just for giving me someone else to talk to right now.

Whistler:“did anybody notice the indigenous model of management proposed yesterday with dual male and female leaders and equal numbers of male and female representatives ... maybe so women and men don't have to fake being each other anymore?”

What was that about?