The Forum > General Discussion > Have the Libs. lost the plot?
Have the Libs. lost the plot?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 38
- 39
- 40
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I hear that this GFC is going to last for anything from three to ten years, so i'm looking for a package that will benfit Australia for the same period and at the same time possitions Austraila to come out of the crisis better, faster, stonger.
This to me means skills, modernisation, infrastructure, investment and jobs.
Insulation bats may help reduce energy consumption and a small part of only one industry. Misses the point?
School refurbishments may be nice but don't actually do anything for education or skills development. Misses the point?
I have yet to see what is meant by "infrastructure" so we don't really know. Might miss the point?
We could go back to the Keating "recession we had to have", we could go back to an unemployment rate at that time of over 10%, We could go back to interest rates of 18% and a national debt of $92 billion. We all want to avoid that and we are nowhere near that yet. Are these good enough reasons for a little caution?
I also think of the infrastructure spending in terms of not just temporary "job creation". I also think of State Rail, State Schools, State Roads and State Hospitals as infrastructure. Doesn't this mean "State Management" of jointly funded infrastructure? Should we ask the question, what have the State governments been doing for the past ten years that require so much extra funding?