no privacy, I'm sorry that you and your ex can't settle things. Having been in a similar position, I can only sympathise. However, I'd strongly urge you to try to work it out without the CSA. The price you may pay for handing over your authority to them is potentially far greater than any benefit that may accrue. It would be preferable to engage solicitors to intermediate if you can't talk face-to-face.

On the tax issue, the new CS laws make it an offence for anyone with an active CS matter to lodge returns annually. I've not yet investigated whether the authority to enforce lies with the CSA General Manager or the Tax Commissioner. I'll have a look later.

The CSA want you to initiate a Section 6B (CoA) application because it greatly expands their authority to act. It also allows them to throw out the formula and make up figures willy-nilly, which can then only be disputed in Court, thereby increasing everyone's costs and potentially preventing some people from challenging their determination for want of available funds to do so. Your ex's car is of no relevance, hp or no, and nor is your mortgage. Failing your lodgement of the CoA application, all is based on gross taxable income.

I can also only agree with your comment about the CSA keeping people in the past. The effects are overwhelmingly negative.

PALE only a group like yours could find any reason, any at all, to think I was in any way referring to you.
I am unsurprised by your miss understanding of my post.
But lets clear this up.
Long ago I came to the conclusion you and I need not communicate with one another.
I intend to stick with that.
But had to defend myself against your false claim.
Rest easy, while I did not agree with a single word you posted in this thread.
I at no time thought you to be part of my alleged tag team.

I've given him some time now to think about it, but I see that antiseptic still has not answered any questions about him providing proof (not mere "accusations") about CSA illegality, despite REPEATED requests. That says it all! I'm happy to have had the opportunity to clear that up.

Antiseptic's altering of that infamous quote has never once been denied by the person who deleted it, Graham. Graham has 'only' said "a quote existed and I deleted it". That also says it all. Glad to have cleared that up as well.

I've just noticed a few pages ago that antiseptic is still up to his old tricks of attempted manipulation. He's now accused the PALEIF people of directly offering him a "bribe". I invite anyone to go back and read the "bribe" posts, and you'll see what an obnoxious drama queen antiseptic has become. He's one "Calamity Jane" after another, a real self obsessed "victim". In one thread, just on thread, he's accused the CSA of illegality, accused a poster here of posting under false pretences to hide their employment with CSA, falsified a past quote and accused PALEIF of attempting to bribe him. Yes people, as usual, that says it all! I'm happy to have cleard that up too.

Yes indeed, now that it's all cleared up, we can now move on.

But, I wonder if "you know who", with veins bursting, will rush in to provide yet another of his "last word" attempts?

SillyG:"a quote existed"

Actually, what he said was "Forrest Gump, the quote existed. I deleted it."

You'll not the use of the definite article by GrahamY in relation to THE quote. I'd be happy to provide a short tutorial on the difference between the indefinite and definite article if it helps.

Don't you get tired of looking stupid, Silly? No? As you were, then.

HA HA! I knew it. He just loves trying to get in the "last word", doesn't he.

And true to form, all he offers is his usual juvenile language and sly insults.

Just imagine what his three ex partners had to put up with.

But he loves to paint himself as a victim, and will continue to do so, while at the same time making malicious allegations against people. All bullies see themselves as the "victim". He still refuses to provide proof of his most malicious allegations yet....the alleged CSA employees use of illegality. He will never answer that, because he CAN'T.

Oh dear, those poor ex partners. Hey Glenn, wouldn't it be interesting to have them come here and tell THEIR side of the story; we've only heard YOUR side so far.

SillyG:"sly insults"

Poor Silly