Belly
You seem to have a problem understanding what is and isnt off post.
This is just like the time you demanded to know why pale was in the Rudd Trade china thread.

I mean really belly- "Trade" - 'China' Rudd "TRADE"

It just so happens the question we want Macolm Turnbull to ask Rudd was about AWB and live exports.

Live exports is very high up the list as political problems in this country.
Our organisation works in this area.

* So it would be pretty normal I would suggest that our comments about Malcom Turnbull and Rudd would sit around that area.*

May I suggest If you dont have the knowledge to understand the connection you learn bit more before you claim we are off topic.

Our Organisation welcomes Macolm Turnbull. We are of course aware he is a farmer so thank god he will sort Tony Burke out.

I can only imagine Macolm Turnbulls comments when he found out Rudd appointed Tony Burke as the Ag Minister. Tony Burke knows 'nothing' of agriculture or farming.

Macolm Turbull must have been as horrified as we were to hear of Rudds irresponsible actions by putting Burke anywhere near agriculture.

So there you go belly we have even told you a "reason" we approve of Macolm Turnbull.

Also what we want Macolm Turbull to ask Rudd in Parliment.

I cant see whats off post about that.

Do learn a bit about politics for our own sake- or stopping attacking our organisation on every posts making false claims.

Its painfull watch you make a fool of yourself. I get no pleasure out of pointing out your ignorance time and time again.

But you insist on trolling from thread to threat rubbishing our organisation.

Typical of ALP mentality I suppose. You dont like us because we set you straight in a few areas where you were totally wrong. I am sure there are some things that YOU might understand when we dont.

However in this case 'once again' we are NOT off post.

For goodness sake grow up.

PALE&IF: << Our Organisation welcomes Macolm Turnbull. We are of course aware he is a farmer >>

Really? There I was thinking he's a lawyer and merchant banker. How is he a farmer? I doubt that he's ever had dirty fingernails.

Belly's right. PALE&IF's up to her usual tricks.

morgan
Just shows how much you really know doesnt it. The real problem with people like yourself and belly morgan is you lack the knowledge to make the connection.

Macolm Turnbull is a farmer- "owns a farm" and has knowledge in the area.
I am not saying he is going to agree with RSPCA on live exports because the power of the political donation by shipping agents is enermous.
I am saying we welcome Macolm Turbull "because at least he has knowledge in the industry."

I suggest you get you facts straight.

I think Turbull is the right man to expose Rudds irresponsible move by appointing Tony Burke who has no knowledge of the industry.

For that reason alone we welcome Macolm.

Now if you and belly have a problem with that too bad.

It is not off post and your only claim to fame is like belly coming in to take swipes at people. Your comments are always two liners attacking people.

I suggest YOU both stick to the thread and post on comments about Macolm Turbull and why you think or dont think hes the right man for the job

As we did in our posts.

Er, PALE&IF - are you aware of the term "Pitt Street farmer"? You know, the kind of guy who lives in the city and buys a farm as an investment or as a hobby - like Turnbull did. To characterise him as "farmer" is an insult to real primary producers. Like I said, I doubt that he's ever got his hands dirty in his life.

Kevin Rudd was born on a farm - does that make him a farmer too?

<< I suggest YOU both stick to the thread and post on comments about Macolm Turbull and why you think or dont think hes the right man for the job >>

You mean like I did here

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2144#45461

and here

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2144#45555

Or did you just leap in and try and push your own barrow without reading the preceding discussion, as per usual?

So we are not to talk about Malcolm, it is a subject that will be discussed a great deal .
He in my view is the man for the job, maybe not yet a winner, I stand by my view he will not win the next election.
It is however time I took my own advice to Nicky.
I refuse to play verbal tennis, to answer charges that are knowingly fabricated.
To be part of diverting yet another thread into one of personal insults.
I would like to see a few polls about Turnbull.
1 to all voters is he the best available Liberal leader?
2 can he win the next election?
3 to conservative voters can he rebuild your party?
In truth my answers are .
1 yes
2 no but maybe the one after
3 not now or ever will I qualify to answer this one warts and all I remain ALP.

Belly

*How crimson rude to divert the thread yet again to animal welfare an inch at a time.*

Er, Actually belly we were simply replying to your above post. We were not off topic or rude. Its as simple as that.

It was you who made the personal attack directed yet again at us.

We simply stayed on post and explained why we welcome Turnbull.

Our organisation has some experience with Kevin Rudds Ministers advisors contacting us pre election- ( Where they claimed they were going to oppose live exports)
Of course two weeks after the election that Minister was dumped and replace with someone who know zero about farming.

Our point was A I think Macolm will do very well as the leader of the opposition .

I agree it will be hard to win the next election but not as hard as you may think.

Rudd is no longer popular with the elderly and many others.
I think there will be a big swing back towards Turnbull.

Of course I could be wrong.
Morgan
Again I must remind you pale does not post to you nor do we want you addressing posts to us.'