The Forum > General Discussion > Just how well-regulated is the live export industry?
Just how well-regulated is the live export industry?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Dickie and Boaz_David, I'm a little mystified by the graphics there too, I must admit. Dramatic licence, perhaps?
Much as it pains me to have to repeat myself in the case of Yabby's pathetic questions, here is what is wrong with Cameron Morse's assessment of the live export industry:
1. Morse is a journo who writes for a farming journal. Is he going to tell farmers anything they may not want to hear?
2. Why did he not go on, say the "Bader III", "Al Kuwait" or the "Torrens" (previously known as the "Farid F" and detained in Australian ports at least six times because it is falling to bits)
3. The woeful imbalance of "competent" crew in relation to the number of animals the "super-carrier" "Becrux" carries
4. The scant detail provided about what happened to the animals once they were off-loaded from the "Becrux" (a couple of paragraphs was all I could find).
I'm sure he had a happy, leisurely cruise at the exporters expense, and they went to great lengths to ensure that he only saw what they wanted him to see. Anything else he saw by mistake he didn't bother telling us about.
Yabby, answer this for us. On THAT voyage of the "Maysora" (November 2006) when they loaded all the Southern bred cattle in clear violation of their OWN standards, 450-odd died. It was identified that the ship had nowhere near sufficient captive bolts to deal with the dying animals. Is this common practice? Likewise THAT voyage of the "Al Messilah" in February 2006.
How is it that Animals Australia has been able to film what they have, on FIVE separate investigations, in multiple countries, if it's as good as you say it is?
Nicky