The Forum > General Discussion > Improper Ministerial intervention in WA live export cruelty case
Improper Ministerial intervention in WA live export cruelty case
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
There was talk when the FOI reports were released about some action in Tasmania over the "Al Messilah" shipment in February 2006, but as I understand it, Tasmania's Animal Welfare Act has a statute of limitations of 6 months, so that was well over by the time the reports got out. It would possibly have failed on the same grounds anyway (i.e., cruelty proven but Commonwealth law over-riding State law.
I can't recall any mortality events arising out of Queensland shipments, but there is the current case of the goats in the Northern Territory.
I think that trying to mount any sort of legal challenge would fail on the basis of standing. The WA Solicitor General, I suspect, would be the only person who can be prevailed upon to act, unless perhaps the Writ of Mandamus instrument could be used again to force him/her to act (carry out a duty).
Cheers
Nicky