Rational people need neither science nor the law to tell them that there are two sexes and they are not interchangeable. It has been thus since Adam and Eve, or whomever you think were the first humans on Earth.

We have to accept that there are very few irrational people who feel that they are a sex that they obviously are not, as per their chromosomes, body, appearance, and they are to be sympathised with.

Not deserving of sympathy are those people who encourage and support their dysphoria because they are naive, stupid or are just in it for entertainment and some warped ideology.

mhaze,

"Gendered sex" is the concept of sexual activity that is influenced, shaped, or defined by the gender identities of the individuals involved. What you’ve quoted of me clearly isn’t referring to that.

--

ttbn,

In other words, you still don’t understand the difference between biological sex and gender.

In just another manipulation of language for political reasons, 'gender', referring to grammatical categories, was captured by radical feminism for political reasons. As usual, dumbed-down society accepted it, in the same way that they complacently accept anything that doesn't affect them personally.

""Gendered sex" is the concept of sexual activity"

No, gendered sex is the sexuality of an individual in the gender world. It stands in potential opposition to biological sex.

If OTOH gendered sex is just about bonking then biological sex as used by you must also be about bonking.

This is all about just playing with definitions. Its Queen of Hearts stuff - the word mean different things at different times based on the needs of the moment.

Man means biological male sometimes when it suits and trans male at other times when that suits. Its about people lying to themselves and demanding that everyone else buy into the lie.

Is a person who has a vagina between his legs which is a attached to a uterus, a small adam's apple and scares where his tits had been removed, male or female in the biological world and the gendered world? I look forward to your obfuscation.

ttbn,

Your claim that this is a manipulation of language is absurd for two reasons:

1. “Gender” has always referred to personal identity and experience, as opposed to the physical reality of biological sex.

2. The concept of gender identity, and the societal expectations placed on males and females, exist regardless. We would therefore still need a word to describe these phenomena, even if “gender” really did mean something different in the past.

Call it “schmender”, for all anyone cares. The fact of the matter is that there are two different things that we’re talking about here.

Ironically, it is only you and others of your ilk who are manipulating language for political reasons in an attempt to conflate the two concepts.

--

mhaze,

No, “gendered sex” and “gendered sexuality” are as different as “sex” and “sexuality”.

But this is all irrelevant to your previous comment, in which you attempted to obfuscate by conflating biological sex with gender by simply tacking the word “sex” onto the end of “gender”.

Like I said to ttbn, we’re talking about two separate concepts here. All the word games in the world won’t change that.

"we’re talking about two separate concepts here. "

No, you are. The rest of us are operating in the real world. They aren't two concepts. They are two different ways at arriving at the same meaning. It is claimed that trans men are men. We all know that biological men are men. So two different ways to allow people to claim to be men - the traditional way and the new fabricated way.

The whole configuration of semantics around the word 'gender' is merely to blur the established meaning of man and woman.

It exists to allow people with vaginas and scars where their breast used to be to claim they are men and rightfully able to use the men's bathroom. Worse, it allows people who have penises and adam's apples and prostates to claim to be women and use the female bathroom.

And it allows blokes to claim female-hood and invade female spaces. It allows people who have all the genetic advantages of being born a biological male, what with greater muscle mass and lung capacity and testosterone, to claim to be a sheila and partake in female sports.

Ultimately its an attack on women. It invalidates female sports and the biological women in those sports. It allows blokes pretending to be female to claim to be lesbian and demand that lesbians be shamed into relations with lesbians with cocks.

Ultimately its a sign of the decline of our culture and indeed our own common sense.

Oh and another front in the ongoing attack on the family.