Indyvidual,

Look more closely at the Republican Party.
It's paved the way for Trump's presidency.
These people mobilize racism to defend their
interests. Trump suits them.

mhaze,

I prefer to accept information from people who
have informed opinions. Like Assoc. Prof.
Brendan O'Connor of the United States Studies Centre
at Sydney University. An expert in US presidential
elections and politics. You as a Trump supporter -
don't measure up.

And for me in order to take any notice of what you post
I would have to respect your opinion

mhaze,

BTW:

I've met my quota of tolerating uninformed people.

I am no longer taking applications.

Thank you.

Of course you have the right to be uninformed.
What I find tiresome is that you abuse the privilege.

"I prefer to accept information from people who
have informed opinions. Like Assoc. Prof.
Brendan O'Connor "

Oh you mean the chap who predicted Hilary as a shoe-in in 2016 and advised all and sundry that Trump was washed up after 2020. Yeah let's take advice from someone with such a great track record.

Can't help but notice not an inkling of an iota of a brass razoo's worth of effort to identify Trump POLICIES that disqualify him. No, in the shallow world that is Foxyland, being uncouth is disqualification enough. But elsewhere she'll preen herself with the claim she votes based on policy not personality. Sheesh!

Foxy won't understand this but others might.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q6__XrbEy0&t=231s

In a better world Tulsi Gabbard would be revered by left and right alike.

But fools who wanted a BIPOC woman in power chose moronic Harris.

mhaze,

How does it feel having a convicted criminal as your supreme leader? I thought you were a believer in law and order, but supporting a criminal, now that's beyond the pale.

Hi mhaze,
I haven't been keeping up with everything going on recently re Trump.

"Well we do actually have a way of testing that. Unlike other candidates, we have evidence of Trump as president. Did Graham et al cause Trump to continue policies that will end up in war when he was first in power? Well anyone with even a modicum of historic memory will know the answer to that."

I know Trump didn't start any wars.
I just don't get the feeling Trump will be any better this time.
- But that's a somewhat ignorant comment.
I haven't been keeping up with everything Trump.

I'm not picking sides so much as I did in 2016.
I supported Trump back then, in a way who I would want if I was an American.

Now I'm not really thinking about it that way,
More whats best for Australia, what's best for the world.
- And I'm not even sure I know what the pro's and con's are.
I'm not entirely sure it makes a whole lot of difference for Australia who's in the Whitehouse.

>>According to AC concerning Navalny: "The charges weren't trumped up, they were legit and he was guilty;"<<
- I met you half-way, and accepted that going after him was certainly politically motivated.
The events had happened back around 2010, he was involved in fraud in connection with a timber scheme.