Dear Foxy,

Nobody is holding you responsible,
not everyone is designed to be a teacher,
not everyone has the patience,
not with a thick-headed student like myself,
so since you cannot help me, perhaps someone else can.

Kudos Josephus.

.

Dear Yuyutsu,

.

Foxy proposed this debate on “The Forum” as follows :

« The Australian Law Commission has worked on a major report that has just been released about anti-discrimination laws and religious schools in Australia … »
.

And you replied :

« In answer to your questions …

“Should religious schools have the right to discriminate?
Should they still get public government funding if they do?
Should gay kids be deprived of a religious education?
Should gay teachers be allowed to teach?” »

… you replied to every one of these 4 questions, Yuyutsu.

You now ask :

« [Please] demonstrate a connection between religion and/or discrimination on the one hand and inequality, injustice, homosexuality and racism on the other »
.

The report explains :

« On 4 November 2022, the Attorney General asked the ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission) to consider reforms to Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws (including s38 of the Sex Discrimination Act and the Fair Work Act).

According to the Terms of Reference for this Inquiry, the purpose of the reforms is to ensure, to the extent practicable, that Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws reflect the Australian Government’s commitment in respect of religious educational institutions and anti-discrimination laws in a manner consistent with the rights and freedoms recognised in the international agreements to which Australia is a party, including the ICCPR.

As stated in the Terms of Reference, the Australian Government’s commitment is that an educational institution conducted in accordance with the doctrines, tenets, beliefs or teachings of a particular religion or creed:

• must not discriminate against a student on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, marital or relationship status or pregnancy;

• must not discriminate against a member of staff on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital or relationship status or pregnancy; and

• can continue to build a community of faith by giving preference, in good faith, to persons of the same religion as the educational institution in the selection of staff »

Here is the report :

http://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ALRC-ADL-Final-Report-142.pdf

I hope this helps, Yuyutsu.

All the best.

.

Dear Banjo Paterson,

Thank you very much for the trouble you have taken to help me!

Now I see, I was asking for a connection between the original questions and the issues Foxy added later, now I understand that this connection is through a mental link or association which Foxy makes between them because they are mentioned in the same paper of some government department, which she must be taking very seriously.

«… you replied to every one of these 4 questions, Yuyutsu.»

Well, I looked and continue to look at the questions as they stand, not through the eyes of an enemy and the brainwashing propaganda they wish to inflict on us.

Religion is very much connected with discrimination, but it is not a discrimination against anyone, but a discrimination between good and evil and between truth and untruth.

Accepting tax-payer's money, and the secular dictates which naturally come with it, is not an example of religious behaviour. Such schools that accept such tainted money may call themselves "religious", but are they?

We are not discussing race or injustice, Marxists cannot see the difference between held opinions with exclusivity and race and justice. Communist mantra is all must abide by the same opinions otherwise it causes conflict. That is why Uyghurs in Communist countries are discriminated against, because of their exclusive beliefs.

It is also coming to the point where science is denied and we must accept rainbow beliefs in our churches ans schools otherwise we are discriminating unjustly, this is a Marxist ideology, in and attempt to destroy the rights of parents to chose a child's upbringing and family values. That is why the rise of children raised in two mum's or two dad's homes are now seeking their biological missing parent. Because their true identity is missing.

This country of ours has always had a tendency to
move to the centre politically. The mandatory
requirement to vote and the active political
discussion and involvement has a lot to do with
this. Right-wing groups are as marginal as left-wing
groups.

Difficult economic times as well as controversial
and emotive issues - stimulate
both groups, but they never gain any real ground and
they tend to collapse over time. The victories are
marginal and short lived. The communist party has
disappeared into history in this country and Pauline
Hanson will also disappear again soon.

The ALRC report and its recommendations are as follows:

http://alrc.gov.au/news/adl-final-report-tabled/