The Forum > General Discussion > Religious Freedom - Or the Right To Discriminate?
Religious Freedom - Or the Right To Discriminate?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Page 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
- All
Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 9:46:09 AM
| |
The Australian Law Reform Commission's
recommendations to government help to simplify the law, promote new or better ways to administer the law and improve access to justice. Of course it's recommendations have to be passed into legislation by parliament. That is why the PM is waiting for bipartisan support before proceeding. As for Justice Mordecai Bromberg? He has been appointed President of the ALRC for a five year term from 10 July 2023. His appointment follows a merit-based process. The Hon. Justice Mark Moshinsky is the acting President of the ALRC - as a part-time Commissioner. Justice Bromberg has significant experience in the leadership of legal research and expertise across a broad range of practice areas, including industrial law, personal injuries, commercial law, product liability, constitutional law, administrative law, and trade practices. He's been a judge of the Federal Court of Australia. He was the founding president of the Australian Institute of Employment Rights and now chairs the Advisory Board of the Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law at the University of Melbourne. The ALRC plays an important role in ensuring our laws continue to work in the best interest of the Australian people and it has some of the sharpest legal minds in the country. Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 10:31:17 AM
| |
cont'd ...
There's more at the following: http://alrc.gov.au/about/ And - http://judicialcollege.vic.edu.au/node/40739 Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 10:58:44 AM
| |
Foxy, Some of the sharpest Legal minds are found in the CCP.
Posted by Josephus, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 11:00:15 AM
| |
Josephus,
How do you know? Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 12:01:01 PM
| |
Dear Foxy,
«For your information:» This is not for my information, this is in attempt to scare me. However, instead of scaring me, this rubbish, this cheap government propaganda, only gives me indigestion and makes me want to vomit. «The rule of law... plays a crucial function by ensuring that civil and political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the equality and dignity of all citizens are not at risk.» I don't care for civil and political rights. Had it not been for your government and its hounds disturbing our peace, I would have my liberty and dignity anyway. And as for 'equality' I have no need to compare myself with others: I live my life and they live theirs. «The rule of law also helps protect the effective performance of the various agencies of electoral, societal and horizontal accountability from potential obstructions, and intimidation by powerful state actors.» I don't care for any of those invented functions - I spit on your rule of law. «In a democracy we must all abide By the law in order to do what's right.» Trying to scare me again? To begin with, there is no democracy, never was, but even if there was, why should I care where it was not by my free choice to have any? No, there is no need for anyone to abide by the laws of evil governments, yours included. Most people have been doing what is right anyway and naturally out of the goodness of their hearts, but now instead, some good people are forced to do things that are wrong and against their conscience for fear of the police and finding themselves at the painful end of your law's stick. People who thus habitually instil fear in others have a name: "Terrorists"! And you seem to support them. Shame! Posted by Yuyutsu, Wednesday, 3 April 2024 12:39:22 PM
|
For your information:
The rule of law, defended by an independent judiciary plays
a crucial function by ensuring that civil and political
rights and civil liberties are safe and that the equality
and dignity of all citizens are not at risk.
The rule of law also helps protect the effective performance
of the various agencies of electoral, societal and horizontal
accountability from potential obstructions,
and intimidation by powerful state actors.