The Forum > General Discussion > Religious Freedom - Or the Right To Discriminate?
Religious Freedom - Or the Right To Discriminate?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
already have inclusive enrolment and employment policies and
they don't want to discriminate against either students or
teachers on any grounds."
At what point does the need to comply to laws taint the religious message itself?
And if the religious message is tainted, then is it really a religious school, or just another government run institution?
At what point does the requirement to not offend gay students and teachers inhibit the religious school from giving the religious education?
One might argue that religious schools should not get funding if the do not adhere to discrimination laws, yes?
But should a student at a religious school be deprived of all funding that would otherwise be given to them if they were not attending a religious school?
- So no money for young Isaac, Ishmael or Matthew to learn english and maths?
And if religious schools did not get government funding, would that mean they would then BE permitted to discriminate, and would Australians support this or consider it lawful, if Islamic kids were permitted to be taught to hate infidels?
And that Jews are permitted to be taught that they will rule over Goyim?
And that Christians give blind support to Israel, and march towards Armageddon?
Should we not have a serious look at the pro's and con's of religions themselves?
Ethics allows us to compare religions against each other or no religion at all.