I'm not sure that siding with either of them is helpful. But oil is critical for the stability of the world- the oil must flow- it's critical for the second industrial revolution- therefore The Middle East needs to function in certain ways. Israel needs The West- The West/ Europe are more stable than other regions of the world- if Israel dominates the Middle East then the world will be stable. But everyone is playing double games- some more than others. There are other considerations too...

"The chanting of "Palestine should be from the river to the sea" or whatever it is- is being interpreted as an implied genocidal threat to Israel- similar to the claim that Aboriginal's own all of Australia."

And similar to the claim that Anglo-European nations should be multicultural- what's going to happen to the Anglo-European's- metaphorically pushed into the sea just like the Israeli Hebrew's- to become stateless peoples. You expect foreigners to want to kill you for your territory- but when locals start to suicidally agree with the foreigners then you have a problem of a higher order of magnitude.

When nations walls break down, cultures break down, local communities break down, families break down, couples break down, then individuals want to commit suicide or don't expend effort to preserve their heritage and their future- they die! There is a loss of meaning, purpose, power- no one deserves- this is the way to chaos and death in the world. What is the evil that has done this to the world? Where is it? Why is it? We must find it and kill it and breathe life back! How do we kill the death that stalks us- without mercy- in mercy's name?

Some groups (even within the CIA) apparently believed that Hebrew's created Communism as proxy war skirmishers and agents- in a similar way that Christianity was created from Hebrew influence to eventually destroy the Roman Empire- certainly there have been many influential Communists of Hebrew ethnicity including Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Herbert Marcuse, Saul Alinsky.

Also people of Hebrew belief's seem to be very influential in popular media (Hollywood), banking, law, business, universities, psychology- power generally- dis-proportionately to their representation within the US community.

Of course being a long stateless people is possible to lead to such psychology- but did they deserve their treatment by the Roman's or Father of the Protestant's- Martin Luther?

Who know's maybe the Hebrew's still hold a vendetta again the Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Empire and it's children- maybe not.

Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation but maybe that is why Thomas Sewell's group is on the Pro-Palestinian side with the Woke Anti-Israel Socialist's and Communist's.

Chicken and Egg. Monkey and Egg.

Communism's eternal morphological change seems likely to create intrinsic tectonic contradictions.

The monkey was irrepressible..

A riddle in a paradox.

Canem Malum,

Interested to see your reference to Equal Workplace Feminists. Albanese is behind this, working away to force women into the workforce, and put their children into care - all to wreck the family; very old-style Soviet tactics.

The family is a real threat to the extreme Left, neo-Communists. Australia will become more and more dystopian under evil Albanese. De-femininising of women; putting younger and younger children into brainwashing factories. It's all there to see.

In the meantime, dull people want to talk about a harmless women who exercised her right to criticise part of the totalitarian machine, the Left's ABC.

Foxy,

I suspect the world would be a better place if there were fewer people convinced that they alone had access to the authentic voice of the deity.

In my youth, I also thought I could converse with YHWH. But then I realised I was just hearing the echo of my own voice.





in response to ttbn,

"The posts here are reaching the bloody ridiculous stage. Grow up!"

Wot she said. Either play along or butt out.

CM,

Forgive me for not reading your entire post beyond; (I can't be bothered with your long winded opinions.)

"Paul1405's comment about the "far right" supporting the Hebrews."

"1. The use of the one dimensional political "Left Right Continuum" seems to be a leftist invention/ legacy from the French Revolution- and distorts the true political landscape in favour of The Left/ Socialists/Communists." (One can only take so much!)

I've said before on the forum that the French have a lot to answer for with the definition of left and right in politics. That gives a false impression that the extremes are poles apart eg, Nazism and Communism, when in fact they are more alike than different. I adhere to the concept of the "Horseshoe Political Theory";

"People who believe in the horseshoe theory argue that the Far-left and the Far-right are closer to each other than either is to the centrists."

In the context of Australian politics, not sure about where you are, the moderates, which is every party represented in parliament have different opinions on various matters, and place different emphasis on policy, but none are radical or extreme to the degree that they want to change the fundamentals of society. They are all happy to work within the framework of a moderate western democracy.

You have often referred to me as a "Communist", maybe from your own radical extreme perspective I am a Communist, and the Popes a pagan. Your fixation and continual referencing of Communists and Communism on this forum, makes on think YOU are a extreme radical with a different bent, but you are never going to admit that, are you?