Fractelle:"I had to make a second request for Roscop to be suspended"

Which, on the evidence, would seem to have been "dismissed"...

Fractelle:"Do you think it appropriate for Roscop to demand as evidence that Nina supply photos of herself after her assault? "

Do go back and read through the thread. This was well thrashed out earlier. Graham has thoughtfully retained all the posts sent to the site to confirm all that is said...

A-septic

Far from being "dismissed" my persistence meant that Graham actually shifted himself to contact Nina for her opinions on Roscop. I am sure you have read Nina's subsequent comments.

Therefore, I can only conclude that you (and apparently Graham) find nothing offensive about Roscop's responses to Nina. Not adding to your credibility.

Very telling about you and how little you care about women who really have been assaulted (not false claims). Who have really been through it and are too afraid to speak out, unlike Nina who has displayed a level of courage beyond many.

BTW: Everyone; Belly has the discussion thread about the Rugby 'gang-bang' which has nothing to do with the topic here.

Fractelle:"how little you care about women who really have been assaulted "

Me (on 18/5):"I have the greatest of sympathy for those of either gender who have been genuinely raped, "

As I said dear, you really must read back over the thread if you wish to avoid looking fooli..oh, hold on, this is Fractelle, isn't it? As you were...

Fractelle:"my persistence meant that Graham actually shifted himself"

It's that ol' squeaky wheel again... You're a feminist hero, you are. Make sure you keep all those emails, won't you, dear? Wouldn't want anyone to doubt your commitment to whinging, would we?

Ginx, Fractelle,

Ginx> "Fractelle's complaint was received somewhat differently to yours;-she was referred to as 'difficult'. I suspect I know why. "

Ginx> "Really? How do you KNOW that?"
Bizarrely, because you just pointed it out above, and Fractelle on some other post said the same thing.

So I presumed Fractelle complains to Graham, there is an argument about it, and Fractelle's dismissed by being called difficult. Not much of a stretch.

And low and behold we have from Fractelle...
'His manner towards my request was terse and impatient, when I pointed out that I did not appreciate his lack of courtesy , Graham described me as 'difficult'.'

Pretty much exactly as I had presumed.

You sound like a couple of school girls proud of themselves as they know the gossip. Get a life man.

It might shock you to know, that Graham probably has very little time for such goings on. In my dealings with him I noted he really doesn't have much of a 'customer service' philosiphy either. But ever since Graham dared to dismiss the requests of a WOMAN (heaven forbid!) Ginxy runs around yelling boys club at every opportunity. It's just sad man.

Ginx 'That is why I don't read any of your- (Neanderthal opinion),-posts in full; I just skim them.'
Seems like you have a lot in common with Fractelle, given what she said in the Susan Giblin thread. So you don't really read people's points, then just group them all into the 'boys club' so that anything you cant answer can be dismissed.

Antiseptic,

'Do go back and read through the thread. This was well thrashed out earlier.'

Of course it was, but Fraccy only skims the 'abusive' posters as you know. Pity they 'cleverly include a valid point within their abuse' isn't it. Actually, since one male poster seems like a stalker, and other male posters don't agree with her, whalla, all those 'boys club' posters must agree with everything the stalker says and does.

Antiseptic -
"As I understand the post of yours you refer to, it was all about "rape is bad, I've been raped and I should know". "

If you genuinely read my post that way then I can only assume that
a)your self-professed eagerness for a bit of argy-bargy has started to cloud your perceptions
b) you have the attention skills of a butterfly,
c) you actually have no interest in discussion; and in fact use these threads in a very selective manner or
d) you are so used to being deliberately provocative it has now become a habit.

You had made the statment that you "suspect" anal rape is painful but seemed in some doubt. I merely confirmed your suspicions and cited my source. I similarly cited my source for knowledge of vaginal rape.

If niether a,b,c or d above applies then you obviously read no further and completely forgot what had come before.

James H: If you could drop the male bonding thing for a moment you would see that beliefs have indeed been stated as facts. As to the rest of your post. Whatever. There are now three threads running on this general topic. I have no intention of going into every nuance.

One thread; fine, but we all have a life to lead. I have no plans to bring a camp bed into my office.
____________________________

"Fractelle:"I had to make a second request for Roscop to be suspended"

Which, on the evidence, would seem to have been "dismissed"..." (septic)

?!?!? ..er,..( You DO know the difference between "being dismissed"..and.."having a request for suspension dismissed"?? You don't do you?)

THATS why I don't bother with this bloke Fractelle.
____________________________

"It might shock you to know, that Graham probably has very little time for such goings on. In my dealings with him I noted he really doesn't have much of a 'customer service' philosiphy either. But ever since Graham dared to dismiss the requests of a WOMAN (heaven forbid!) Ginxy runs around yelling boys club at every opportunity. It's just sad man."

How very sweet....;man! Do you think that that will get you some Brownie points? (Bit like septics 'Graham has thoughtfully retained..', ((another one with inside knowledge!)

As to the rest: a garbled mishmash. But vintage Hollowbeak.