Ginx to be honest with you, I started skimming over Roscops posts when he started challangeing Nina, because it was not where I want to go, I also started skimming Nina's posts as well.

So I did not read either of their posts very well at all.

So I repeat my self, because I did not object to Roscops posts, does not mean that I necessarily agree with his posts.

This also applies equally to other posters, as well, I make choices and I am selective about what I object too, challange or support in this forum.

If two people want to have an arguement, then I'll let them without sticking my nose in.

Antiseptic: Well it's nice to see that you're finally taking the trouble to look sme sources up yourself before mouthing off. Pity that you choose to misread or misuse what you see.

That fact is that you have little to fear from women; you are probably too old to be at great risk from men either, but if you are sexually assaulted, the perpetrator is overwhelmingly likely to be male.

Btw - young men under age 17 are at greater risk. Still, even a few dozen elderly men get raped each year.

So,

<" The National Crime and Safety Survey of 2002 (ABS, 2004)
indicated that, over a 12 month period, the rate for sexual
assault for persons aged 18 and over was 0.2 per cent
(33,000 victims) overall; 0.4 per cent (28,300) of females
and 0.1 per cent (4,800) of males. Recorded Crime Statistics
2003 (ABS, 2004) indicated police records of sexual assault
victimisation involved a total of 18,237 victims: 14,892 for
females (149.8 per 100,000) and 3,255 for males (33 per
100,000)."> and

<"New South Wales
The NSW Recorded Crime Statistics (2005) recorded a total
of 3,503 sexual assaults for females and 644 for males.
Indecent assault, acts of indecency and other sexual
offences indicated 4,226 for females and 971 for males.
Males represented 15-18 per cent for recorded incidents.
Data from NSW and Victoria show a consistent pattern.
Although most victims are female, males represent a
substantial minority of overall figures.">

http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/pubs/wrap/acssa_wrap2.pdf

Additional survey information:

http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/statistics.html

So bringing all your wisdom to bear; what do men, especially young males, need to do to avoid tempting those poor alleged perpetrators, and why would the alleged victims be reporting alleged incidents? Regrets the morning after?
After all; it just comes down to he said/ he said doesn't it.

James: Back peddling is a very unattractive posture. You not only commiserated with Roscop over being hounded by a pack of women but talked about having a beer with him. Few people respect a sycophantic marshmallow.

Pynchme, now you are twisting what I wrote.

Adding meaning that was not there.

Mind you, that is a typical female tactic and highly manipulative.

"that is a typical female tactic and highly manipulative"

JamesH finally completes outing himself.

About time. At least with Roscop, you know where you stand.

To quote James:

<"Roscop, boy did you managed to push one of GINX's buttons, by the looks of it, it was a rather big button.

Now the others smell blood and have joined in.

If I was you Roscop, I'd apply for the CIA witness protection program, it just might keep you safe from this mafia for a while.

I think Nana did very well in dealing with you.

I have seen this played out a number of times before, where a girl or one of her freinds takes offense at what a guy said or did, they then try and get other guys involved to teach this guy a lesson, which usually means he gets the living daylights bashed out of him.">

and

<"Apart from what Roscop writes here, I do not know what he really beleives or disbeleives as we have not had good chin wag over a beer.">

No need for me to write any more; your own comments are self-explanatory; including the last one.

Mercy, mercy I beg for mercy.

Nah just kidding.

Obviously Pynchme you have never had the wonderful experience of hearing two very drunks blokes solving the world problems, telling their life story to anyone stupid enough to think that you can get a rational conversation out of two drunks.

Anyway again I reiterate, that you add meaning that is not there. Just because two people have a drink together does not mean that they agree with each other.

If I take the meaning that you are so keen on implying, then if a woman agrees to have a drink with a bloke, she is signalling that she agrees to have sex with him. Any bloke makes this assumption is plain stupid.