The Forum > Article Comments > The inventiveness of John Howard - the SIM card terror case > Comments
The inventiveness of John Howard - the SIM card terror case : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 23/7/2007No one can accuse John Howard (and his rather dreary acolytes) for being uninventive.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
You said “It is more than clear than a young man working in Brisbane was not in a burning jeep in Glasgow and even if an expired sim card was in the jeep the young doctor still could not have committed any crime.”
If the sim card was given to Kafeel to help with avoiding electronic surveillance then that would be conspiracy to assist in a terrorist related offence. That IS serious.
We haven’t seen any evidence that suggests that this was what Haneef was attempting to do? But that’s not what you said.
The Howard gov’t have made a real mess of this situation, no doubt. I hope they lose the next election
“The Orwells in England”, why not go the whols hog, surely they are Nazi’s aren’t they marilyn. Your hysterical ranting weakens your case with everyone except those who already share your far left views. There are very good reason why terrorist suspects aren’t always told what evidence they are being held on. The most obvious is that it denies those accomplices out there any knowledge of the police/security forces investigation.
The perpetrator Kafeel Ahmed, is the brother of Sabeel and the second cousin of Haneef. Who cares if he’s nearly dead? Are we meant to feel sorry for him? He tried to kill as many men women and children as he could.
Marilyn you are an expert on the effects of explosives? You think they should be treated more leniently because they are inept? Their intent was to kill as many people as they could as well as damaging/destroying the airport terminals. It doesn’t matter that they weren’t very good at it.