The Forum > Article Comments > Pregnancy is not a disease > Comments
Pregnancy is not a disease : Comments
By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 24/7/2006Women are going to be 'treated' for pregancy using an anti-cancer drug to induce an abortion.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Page 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
- All
I don't however believe that it helps society to close off discussion of the broader issues to some sections of the community just because they are not "directly" impacted by the issue.
My point about what the no-choice mob are doing was not just about being fair to them (I think Philo can vouch for my failings in that area), it is also about the kind of risks we take as a society when we keep topics behind closed doors. It's the kind of thinking which used the other way kept women out of the "important" decisions because they were mens business. I still think the comparison between your campaign and what the no-choice crowd are trying to do is valid even if I don't agree with them on this issue. We may have to disagree on that.
Robert, should the father of an unplanned child have any responsibility for that child? That is an area where this discussion gets pretty murky. I know of at least one case personally where a women kept the existence of a child secret from the father right up to the point where he got sent for a DNA test as a precursor to the large bill for child support. NOt only did he miss out on involvement in the formative years of his childs life he has also been hit with a significant financial penalty. I've heard of others in a similar vein.
R0bert