its the usual IslamoFacists at it again...

to the liberalists - can you tell me the the heritage of the men who stabbed five young Australians, one of them a girl, on Sydney's Bondi beach, as reported by:

-The Dialy Telegraph
-The Herald

AND

-The Australian

- and as stated by The NSW Police

....................................................

MIDDLE EASTERN!!

Have a look at the link - in Europe school art classes are no longer allowed to draw representations of human figures to APPEASE the Muslims - A CLEAR MUSLIM-HOLD ON EUROPE!! thousands of years of children drawing self-portraits now OUTLAWED by a FRIGHTENED SCHOOL!! 9and not to mention the "self-cencorship" that gopes on after the murder of the dutch film maker - the same "self-censorship" that the Danish newspaper tried to elucidate to the IDOT LEFTISTS AND LIBERALISTS through the publication of the cartoons, as stated by that paper's editor).

Don't you liberalists tell me that Islam has no hold on Europe society - just look at the article and the link -

ITS TIME FOR THE LIBERALISTS TO SHUT UP AND HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME!!

Art class caves into IslamoFacists

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=19349_Hands_Are_OK&only

and something for those Australians who still have a sense of humour (given the intimidation, hatred for white Australians by middle easter thugs, threats of rape to 'strappless, backless clothed' Australian girls by Islamic Sheiks, rape of 'Aussie sluts' who 'deserve it because they are Australian', Aussie bashing at odds 50:1 as happened to Steve B, the 'gun-culture' drive by shootings on Australian homes, and the constant leftist and liberalist taunts that we are racist because we have had enough of our daughters being raped, of being intimidated and threatened and hated because we are white AUstralian infidels!!
we have experienced all the above, and until you spend a night walking about Lakemba at night, or let your daughter walk around their, and see what happens to you, then shut up!

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=19352_Toonophobia&only

The "Muslim" problem (if I may call it that) is complex and is the result of many factors that have combined to form a dangerous mix.

1. First of all there is the "numbers" factor. One, two, three Muslims, a thousand and no problem. However, when the numbers of Muslims reach a certain point, the trouble starts. This is not scientific, but it happens. If given a chance, if given the opportunity, if they have enough people, Muslims will try to impose their ideology on others.

Understand that most Muslim are not bad or terrorists, much to the contrary. They are just indifferent and in denial. They will not stand up for your rights and they cannot effectively oppose the radicals. The key word there is "effectively". They will just make excuses. They know about the hate and anger in the Quran, but are in denial. They know about the vile, evil deeds of Mohammad but don't want to think of them.

2. Remember that Muslims do not have a Judeo-Christian heritage or even a Western cultural background, but come from societies based upon concepts such as sharia, jihad and dar al-islam and dar al-harb.

3. Add to these the current policies of PC talk and multiculturalism, that silence any criticism and encourage Muslims to not integrate.

4. Include modern technologies and the globalization movement, which facilitate maintaining a separate cultural identity.

5. On top of all this consider the welfare state which makes work unnecessary and attracts the worse kind of people.

All of these circumstances together make the Muslim "problem" a new phenomenon and an explosive one. Forget past immigration experiences, this is a whole new ball game.

The fact is that Islam is a religion of hate and anger (and denial). Either you face it or you can kiss your freedoms good-bye.

Don't blame the Muslims! They are just doing what their dear prophet did: Denial, then deceit, then hate, then oppression, then murder, then enslavement - and then it really gets bad. Think about it.

John Kactuz

"Radical Muslims kill, moderates make excuses"

Mr Yusuf describes Mark Steyn as a ‘Muslim hater’ and in an above post describes his Australian Op-Ed piece as ‘anti-Semitic’.
Mr Yusuf clearly uses the term anti-Semitic in the sense that people of the Middle East are considered Semitic. In so doing Mr Yusuf is attempting to conflate legitimate concerns on the compatibility of Islam and modern liberal democracy with anti-Semitism.
One can only assume that his implicit argument is that the targets of Mr Steyn’s criticism are victims of prejudice- not unlike the Jewish victims of the Shoah.
No Mr Yusuf, they are not. And no Mr Yusuf, the article was not anti-Semitic.
Of course what makes Mr Yusuf’s ‘anti-Semitic’ tag even more offensive and mendacious is that many of Mr Yusuf’s co-religionists in the Middle East currently fluctuate between admiration for Adolf Hitler and a denial that the Holocaust occurred.
And of course, one presumes that Mr Yusuf was well aware that Mark Steyn is of Jewish descent

I had hope of Irfan being a man of reason.While Muslims did come to Australia 150 yrs ago their numbers were miniscule.It was not until the 1980's that large numbers were invited by our largely Christian population to immigrate here.Irfan seems to implying that this country is up for grabs and he can inflict his Muslim philosophy on us all.

Sorry Irfan,we are tired of the thrust and perry of your word games.

Muslims are further alienating themselves from mainstream Australia.

Oh yes.. all that HATE... and lets never forget.. "If they disagree with we muslims.. they therefore HATE us"...

Steyn raises a legitimate democgraphic question:

* Can a society become more Muslim in its demographic character without also becoming more Muslim in its political and civil character?

Yep..that sounds so much like vitriolic hate to me......*cough*

Irf.. I've told you not to neglect the medication..... c'mon.. wake up mate.

You know how doctors would describe someone attributing 'hate' to 'disagreement'.. I think they call it 'paranoia'

So, first it is 'You canNOT publish cartoons which portray Mohammed
Now its "You can NOT discuss Muslims demographics.."

What next Irf ? I thought I'd left the "Illegal 5 sensitive issues" behind in Malaysia. One of which was of course 'demographics/race'.

I think I'm understanding where all the 'armchair nazi' comments are coming from.. your new mates have infected you :)

OUR women and THEIR women. welllll.. one of my favorite subjects.

Here is the deal. Communities consist of males and females. Tribes, Families, etc.. and (now this might come as a shock) females of families and tribes are connected by blood and relationship... so that it is quite correct to speak of "OUR" women.
Just as it is for women of that community to speak of "OUR" men. duh !

Only complete 'drongo' would impute the idea of 'ownership' to that.. Its never meant it in the past with our culture that I know of.. and I doubt it means it now. It means 'those of our community' .. so get a grip all you try hard wanna be feminazis, surely you can come up with something better to hang a cause on.

So, drongo by game ? = drongo by name.