The Forum > Article Comments > Who are the 'Deniers' now? > Comments
Who are the 'Deniers' now? : Comments
By Anthony Cox, published 22/4/2013What should we call global warming activists who claim that global warming is accelerating, despite the evidence?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
Posted by cohenite, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 9:38:12 PM
| |
It's a good film Poirot, no ideological tripe.
Anyone who ignores or dismisses it has their head in the sand. Posted by qanda, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:04:18 PM
| |
No Hasbeen, the new version came out before and when the data from the
old versions arrived I wrote a quick patch to snatch them and convert them and send a message back to update. So in this part of the world we never saw many, but before the patch if they got in they were a nuisance as they would not expire for 9000 years. It did not cost us any money as the software is freeware and the French author fixed it all. Posted by Bazz, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:04:12 PM
| |
"It's a good film Poirot, no ideological tripe."
It starts with an image of a child; the use of children by the alarmists is despicable: http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2011/09/kids.html AGW is nothing but ideological tripe. 'Trust me, I'm a climate scientist.' Posted by cohenite, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:47:39 PM
| |
Mr Cox, did you watch the film?
http://thiniceclimate.org/blog/details/2658/thin-ice-the-inside-story-of-climate-science Are the scientists in that film the "deniers" as you impugn in your topic? Are the scientists the "alarmists" and "extremists" as the ideologues in the film say? Posted by qanda, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 7:09:57 AM
| |
I looked at it qanda.
I saw some establishment shots of scientists being just ordinary, good folk, some ice tunnels and some comments about those good scientists being demonised by frothing at the mouth deniers. I'm not interested in this makeover crap. The ideological message of AGW has been pushed with aggression, intolerance and constant vilification of deniers. That message has failed. Now, in typical and hackneyed political fashion we are going to see the good climate scientists be reinvented as just average nice guys with a goodhearted concern about everyone else. This article presents some objective evidence; you have not commented on it but simply linked to this ad promoting the film. Comment on the evidence; pick a bit and say where it is wrong and stop insulting me with this emotional crap. Posted by cohenite, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 8:24:15 AM
|
http://skepticalscience.com//pics/Ahmed_2013_paleo_fig4.jpg