The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific heresy > Comments
Scientific heresy : Comments
By Matt Ridley, published 4/11/2011How do you tell the difference between science and pseudoscience using global warming as an example.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Monday, 21 November 2011 3:16:26 PM
| |
ssstezza quote..""DNA canbe produced from..RNA and vice versa.In fact I have done this today,.""
this was her..reply to first life but lets egsamin the words...""I have done this..*today"" today..in this case..was..""Sunday,20/November"" so clearly..this abuser..uses poetic-licence..lightly no specific claim..to having a phd.. nor refered..to any studies..she specificly/personally..makes claim to, nor any docterates..nor mention..of her field..beyond lab asisting/molecular biology..to wit playing with bits.. dead bits..[processing]...ie a process worker Evolution studies..what changes..living things dna isnt life..[in short..we have spin] i could go on..with her delusions of grandure but know..not to expect..any real answers.. [nor names]..of first/life..etc she makes a point..to say later.. saying..""RNA itself..in nucleic acid,"" [in or is..!].. so lets clarify..her ignorance [too much..self head-slapping?] http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/583rnatypes.html ""Messenger RNA..(mRNA)..is synthesized..from a..gene segment..of DNA which..ultimately contains..*the information*... on..the primary..*sequence..of amino/acids.. *The..messenger RNA..*carries the code..! into the cytoplasm..where protein/synthesis occurs"" in short..she is full of lies..again so..lets go to her point,..lol,,,3 "" me.."SO you think..nucleic acid..TO BE LIFE" [she]..Yes I do,"" so lets hear..of these other..'lives'...lol ""Several distinctive features of..the genetic code..are clearly evident..."" ie rna..is code.. not life...! ""First,..all of the 64 codons..or triplets have a known function,..with 61..*coding for*..amino/acids.. and the other 3..serving as a stop or termination signal..for protein synthesis"" but..its much harder..[complicated] [..to disprove/refute..&..*a lie but heck this fraud..must be held..to account need look no further..than a google/search ""The RNA world hypothesis..proposes*..that life *based on*..ribonucleic acid..(RNA)"" ie based on/thus not..*of itself 'life' ]you deciever[..! or..""Carl Woese hypothesized*""...lol ""that RNA..*might be catalytic* and..*suggested*..that the earliest forms of life >>(*self-replicating molecules*)<<..*could have..*relied on RNA..."" to wit..half/wit NOT LIFE! read..the darn link further..you said..AFTER I QUOTED ONLY WIKIPEDIA FACTS..! ""Thanks for the info,..although..lol as a cell/molecular..biologist""...lol YEAH got any proof...?..lol ""I am aware..of all of this."" then..in her next breath ""I am also aware...lol..that you..don't have a clue what you..are talking about."" it wernt me talking..sister! but..i think people..*get..where you come from next..Vku..quote..""explanation..how the earth populated..by all the different..ethnic groups,"" vku..recall noah..had sons..[with wives]! the..&so called eves..science makes claim to ignorance..is no excuse you live with/by..the fruit[gifts]..of god yet fail to see..the amasing cause.. Posted by one under god, Monday, 21 November 2011 10:47:06 PM
| |
OUG,
1. I don't need to prove my credentials to you. I'm not using my phd as evidence I know more than you. I'm sure I knew more than you before I even started by tertiary eduction. 2. Yes I work weekends. 3. I am not female. (although it is interesting that you seem to assume that people that disagree with you are female. Superiority complex?) 4. Define life. You have neither refuted anything I have said, nor proven any of your claims. I note that you have not denied believing in a literal interpretation of the book of genesis. I am happy for you to live in this world of make-believe, however every time you attempt to claim any BS regarding science/evolution, I will be here to put you back in your box. Ignorance prevails when smart men do nothing. Posted by Stezza, Tuesday, 22 November 2011 1:09:13 AM
| |
one under god,
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn. Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Tuesday, 22 November 2011 9:49:20 AM
| |
ok
you..just act like.. a girlly/girl you said""1.I don't need to prove my credentials to you."" yet have repeatedly..quoted them at me...lol to wit..monday..""although as a cell/molecular-biologist I am aware..[lol]..of all of this"" but heck..you can 'be' anything http://www.google.com/search?q=stezza+female+%3F&btnG=Search&oq=stezza+female+%3F&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=60570l61119l0l64107l4l4l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0 but most certainly..not a qualified evolutionist cause thats..not a science qualification! cause its a theory..not a science you thus are nuthin..confirmable except that revealed..in your opinions get some faulsifyables[science fact] or go away you have added little but correction..[opinion]..without accreditisation.. [thus again..voice opinion..not authority] you think to say little..that your clever but usually saying little..means you lie anyhow i will keep quoting info..from links to let others decide..if your only fluff and wind...mate interesting to note.. your first 3 posts here[olo]..were aimed at me here is your first http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=8921#141686 ""Your correct in stating..that there is an apx..2% genetic difference..between humans and ape,..this must me taken..in the context that >90% of our DNA..does not code for genes,..thus protein."" not acid..? oh high..and tightly wound one ""This makes the 2% difference in DNA"" then note the qualifier, ""of which we know.. the gene function..""lol ""more significant than it sounds."" even then..*seemingly to disagree yet confirming..what i just said to wit spin you began with miss naming me.. then..""While entitled..to your opinion"" next you tried to refute my using genus...saying ""all species are related..to each other by some means,"" to which my reply would be.. YEAH cause..the one hand of god..alone..done it he done it ALL.. thus all..has the mark..of its creator's hand..on it interstingly you didnt then make claim..*to be any biologist... ""as for a cell membrane, I'm quite sure..LOL..that lipids..can be easily formed my chemists."" though then..of course you claimed to be a boss but mate..*lipids arnt cell membranes and if its so easy.. STOP TALKING ABOUT IT..AND DO IT..!@ but you cant..to wit half wit..SPIN..! interestingly..THEN ..you didnt think dna as life ""some theories would suggest viruses and plasmids..could be considered living,"" SOME THEORIES...lol.. now your latest THEORY..is dna is life...lol and no.. i didnt agree them..to be life then and still dont.. continued Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 22 November 2011 1:11:24 PM
| |
but then..you changed again
lol your that teacher doing the same..rote..bacteria-experiments.. to impress..1st year med students..gee your god...lol lol...thought you sounded familour and persistantly..opinionated [biassed]..lol..TO A fraud THEORY..! ok mate by your own words..[that explain why..you say..so little actual/fact] YOU/quote..""It may be frustrating..that science does not*..provide complete..'proof'..of its various theories*."" not for me i think..*most..*know theory..*from fact..! ALL YOU GOT..IS THEORY..and teaching 1st year students the same bacteria party-trick...breeding..lol..the same *genus of bacteria ONLY EVER BACTERIA!..[never anything else] [as in..evolution..of genus]..required if valid] your..NEVER EVOLVING ANYTHING except..at the micro..[species]..level not the macro level..beyond bacteria genus.. the evolving..revolving/THEORY needs theories..are like aholes..we each got..at least one BUT SCIENCE..*NEEDS replicatable FACT...! get it blind-freddy? as for nipples..that was..the form..[cellular].. the beginning..of the big bang.. also..the shape of the earth..and the universe you confuse the way..with the result but lets return to..*the cell.. [that you muggin's..can melt..in acid.. to get at..its dna..]..kill the cell BUT..CAN NEVER..ever HOPE TO MAKE..[create] cause only god..can do that [ie make a seed..or..a cellular membrain] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_cycle ""The cell cycle,..or cell-division cycle, is the series of events..that takes place..*in a cell"" noting all dna..is naturally found..*only..*within a cell [i will talk of..the trickery you apply later..to get dna..out of its cell..and then..the process you use..by rote to multiply it... ie..process work a thing..any monkey can do. continue quote..events in cell.. ""leading to its division..and duplication(replication)."".. replicating the dna/rna/mitroconda..plus cell ""In cells..without a nucleus(prokaryotic), the cell cycle..occurs via a process termed binary fission. In cells with a nucleus..(eukaryotes),the cell cycle..can be divided in three periods:..interphase—during which the cell grows,accumulating nutrients..needed for mitosis..and duplicating its DNA—[in/cell] and the mitosis..(M)phase,during which the cell* splits itself into two distinct cells,..often called "daughter cells" and the final phase,Cytokinesis, where the new cell*..is completely divided."" if you be..what you claim to be here are some..of your 'teqniques' only you have disolved the bacteria cell..in acid and only trick..the dna replication process..via chemical..not life that in the end..its only reacting..to chemical input copying/mimicing[moking]..what god does intra cellular autonimously.. which will lead.. no where near..living autonomy... nor validate..a fraud theory gods nature/nurture..does..it..by itself 2b continued Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 22 November 2011 1:43:58 PM
|
maybe forever...post limits are fun
so take your free shots till them..
we got ther alco ocolight..who finally
has written something able to be read...yeahh
[even if its just a mock defense
of a god she dont believe in]
she yet stood up for our beloved old teat...
who nurtures...every living thing..their very living
even the lol..biologist..so clever at spinning spin..as she is as sepperating out dna..from living cells..cells she and her ilk gotno chance of ever making..
let alone explaining/REPLICATING
how a first/cell..could possably come to 'be'bby fluke
but lets not..ignore their collective inteligence
they will in time..via study of life,,[not death]..explain
in part..how god might have done 'it'
and hope..they..by then created their *own cell
using their..*own logic and..own*dust
not busted up cell bits
that only god could have made
at least if she..is doing study..
not rote work..like refining dna for sequencing..like a robot
much like an other athiest..i once met
who specialised in..[some other aspect]..they call science..
but that is only replicatinmg..the same bacteria..into a micro evolution..to wit evolving..*a species within the same ol genus..
into a new species..NOT A NEW GENUS..
but them..decrying genus
think micro[evolution..validates macro evolution[into new genus]
lol..theorise..lol..
dna can macro evolve...into a new genus....
like a half coldblood fish..with scales..into a warm blood/beast with fur...[how strange..not one inbetween survived]..lol
in short you..who study and clone dna
what have you personally evolved
nuthin
thought so
have a nice delusion
you who cant hold forth..any origonal thought
only parrot out..peer revieuwed rot..[spin]
lol
the seggregationinst dna analyst..see the joke
never bred anything in her life...
nor evolved..even her own thinking
and an occult-lite
and the vacufuccus..ok im gone