hey good to read your rave..professor..lol
replied it hours ago

but waited for 4 hours to post here
it runs about 3 normal olo posts

so your questions
and self rightious judgments of your owbn theory...i replied it

right here ol mate
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=12018&p=91994#p91994

thanks lol..
for the peer re-vieuw,,,lol

i peer revieuwed..your revieuw
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=12018&p=91994#p91994

made some corrections....of fact
like you quoting me..as origonating
the theory of distance...

reseting creation acts..of species
that applies equally to genus...because
its the same genus relitive conditions..that audit for errors

to wit its your own theory..you tried to refute...

lol the same one
the aj thinks will save him..needing to explain
or name names or mechanisms

[quote]
""Anyway,I’m looking forward
to your response to Stezza’s fourth point.

If it holds, you’ll earn yourself a Nobel prize.
[/quote]

a professor getting a nobal prize
mate drweam on...yep if it holds up

but it fwell down..
big time

read the link

lol...the professors poke/joke
is refuted see link

[quote]

Should be interesting.
Posted by AJ Philips,
[/quote]

lol

its a fun read
only interesting by the word twisting the lol science peer does
in trying to find something his link can judge

look forward to your phenotype
genotype definitions after your attempted redefinition..of genus/species

and finding out..*your 'distance'...lol
as calculated by your lol link

lol
thanks ol mate

it was a hoot

great professing profeassor...lol
masterly redirection in lue of nanming names/mechanisms..
and filling in the evolving ever growing gaps...

explain phenotype and genotype
to ya mate...no genes from ol fossil;..stones
to say..*if related or not...

who knows maybe you got more
than just clever decptive linkages
you then try to refute..by claiming i said them

lol

lol...scylance..lol

here is why

seems they like to gang up once i reach my post limit

no worries..the record of their lies
lies here
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12844&page=0
but here is what i plan to say there
[in an hour]..lol

:lol:

hey good to read your rave..professor..lol
replied it hours ago

but waited for 4 hours to post here
it runs about 3 normal olo posts

so your questions
and self rightious judgments :arrow: of your own theory...

i replied it
right here ol mate
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=12018&p=91994#p91994

thanks lol..
for the peer re-vieuw,,,lol

i peer revieuwed..your revieuw
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=12018&p=91994#p91994

made some corrections....of fact
like you quoting me..as origonating
the theory of distance...

reseting creation acts..of species
that applies equally to genus...because
its the same genus relitive conditions..that audit for errors

to wit its your own theory..you tried to refute...

lol the same one
the aj thinks will save him..needing to explain
or name names or mechanisms

[quote]
""Anyway,I’m looking forward
to your response to Stezza’s fourth point.

If it holds, you’ll earn yourself a Nobel prize.
[/quote]

a professor getting a noble prize
mate dream on...yep if it holds up

but it fell down..
big time

read the link

lol...the professors poke/joke
is refuted see link

[quote]

Should be interesting.
Posted by AJ Philips,
[/quote]

lol

its a fun read
only interesting by the word twisting the lol science peer does
in trying to find something his link can judge

look forward to your phenotype
genotype definitions after your attempted redefinition..of genus/species

and finding out..*your 'distance'...lol
as calculated by your lol link

lol
thanks ol mate

it was a hoot

great professing profeassor...lol
masterly redirection in lue of nanming names/mechanisms..
and filling in the evolving ever growing gaps...

explain phenotype and genotype
to ya mate...no genes from ol fossil;..stones
to say..*if related or not...

who knows maybe you got more
than just clever decptive linkages
you then try to refute..by claiming i said them

lol

dr stezza puts in his bit
[quote]Welcome to peer review my friend."""

welcome to the audit :lol:

[quote]..i am more interested in trying to understand the theory/beliefs that you discuss,..rather than correcting your mistakes or explaining facts to you.

You critique of modern evolutionary theory
is contradictory and lacking in logic.

My summary of what I have learnt:

1. You agree that evolution occurs,...end"""[/quote]

at the species level..sure..darwins finches
long beaked in good times..short beaked..in bad times
[for reasons..previously explained]

yes you grow bACTERIA EVERYDAY
AND MEASURE THE DNA CHANGES
but in the end..its still bacteria

it will never evolve out of its genus bounds
heck it mostly..still the same species...[im guessing]
definitivly the same genus..cause you got nuthin

[quote]..and this results in the change of organisms
over time to produce different species and sub-species.[/quote]

quite correct
NOT EVER :!: ANY NEW GENUS

sure yes
microevolution..within genus fine
but crocodile...lol..into land dog...NOT ONE
PRESENT..*EVIDENCE..

[quote]2...You do not believe..that the evolutionary mechanism
is capable..of producing change..on the scale of genus.[/quote]

absolutly*
every species breeding..of like with like
has made..just genus..like itself..!

not one rabbit
evolved..into dog..*ever

no half/cold..half/warmblood..
no cat/dog..*EVER

[quote]3...You believe
that 'god'..'creates' new genera..[/quote]

in lue of..*either of us..knowing
i go with..god done it

till..you lot..lol
figure out..HOW god dun it

[quote]..and that species..within
this 'created' genus
cannot evolve..past..a certain point..

due to DNA repair mechanisms
at..the species level..when the species..are
"too far..from the genus mean"...[/quote]

species..can only fluctuate
between..[within]..its genus bounds

thats..what im saying
in part..and in lue of someone
actually naming..a mechanism
that..*can change genus..

diveregences like..from am-fib-ian..into mammal
or lol mammal..into whale..well mate
name names..PROVE IT..!

..ok you have tried..to simplify
our conversation into..these few

so
lets see..why you cant name names..
and got nuthin..in the gaps..[not one intermediate]

a fraud link
linking together
a massive delusional fraud

[quote]..My critique..of this theory/belief:
1.Your critique..of genetics(DNA repair)..[/quote]

i note your quickly..rushing
into joinder with..another subject

re..this part/one

im not critiqueing..dna repair
it egsists..AS I PUT FORWARD..

so we agree?
..its valid..[right?]

so lets go your..next tricky part
lol..of part...the..one question

[quote]...and fossil records..as evidence for evolution
is not compatible..with the theory you discuss,[/quote]

again
*you..have created..a fraud joinder

im saying..fossils..are looks like..[phenotype]
not linked..by genes...[not genotype]

but..lets leave..your ignoring of them
as validating..their usages

as i proposed them..to be

so far..you join together
a thing..i agree
with a thing..i vermantly..disagree with

in the same sentance
using..ten words

that takes..30 to correct

[quote]..as evolution..is proposed to occur
through the same/mechanism..at the sub-species,species and genus level...Thus your arguments
are contradict..your own beliefs.[/quote]

no
your trying..to be too clever/by half
neatly avoiding comment..on phenotype v genotype

the same mechanisms
control all breeding's
that prevented..even at species
prevents genus..lol..evolving

now see
why..you try
to cleverly..twist words

fossilised..looks like..[phenotype]..is the lie!

just cause..i got a rock..that looks/like you
dont mean its you..nor your daddy

even clouds..that.."look like'..beasts
arnt beasts..extinct beasts..cant be linked..to any living thing

its dead..BECAUSE it micro/evolved..
couldnt breed..so died out..

what it looks like...phenotype
mutated it...and killed it

it failed
the law..of survival..OF THE FITTEST..!

to wit
it dead-ended

couldnt breed
died off...not a little step..to nowhere..!

leaving no genes

[quote]..2...The statement..that a supernatural being
interferes with the material-world..is both unnecessary and non-scientific.[/quote]

its my thesis
cause yours is..a clear lie

what god did..in the beginning
has no evidence/proof..in the things/he does today

we learn we grow
then trust..our creations..to learn grow too

but its god..who sustaine's
every living thing..their being

thats all god does..where life is
there is god..sustaining it..its very life

the best you science lot have got
is autonimous reflex...lol

chance/luck..lol...natural*..selection
science cant claim 'natural*..

when life..is a delicate balance
you guys..cant come close..to replication

[science needs to faulsify proofs..or at least
be capable of replicating..the theory

ie demonstrate..
have the ability..to replicate..!

science's best..hand/form
is nothing..on the ones..god gave most of us

[quote]..As this aspect
cannot be proven..or disproved,[/quote]

lol
by you science..professors
professing a theory
got nuthing

[quote]..then the requirement..for this aspect
means that the theory..remains in the same category..as all other creationist beliefs.[/quote]

agreed
in lue of faulsifyable fact

we both..chose the theory
we..lol..got..*faith in

AND THE PAIN OF AVOIDANCE GOES ON

as previously posted
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=12018&start=10

but mate
your a scientist
you got science?..name names..replicate..dont speculate

[to whom..much is given..much more
is to be expected]

[quote]..3.The mechanism..you propose that prevents evolution
into species..of a different genus[/quote]

again using word trickery ol mate

:arrow:..i NEVER SAID
THAT SPECIES DONT EVOLVE..INTO OTHER SPECIES

i did say
:arrow:..no species
can evolve..*out of its genus

but lets look
at your proof..if any
of lol..new genus evolving

nuthin

you suggest
that my theory suggests..[quote]..""suggests that DNA repair mechanisms..vary in efficacy..in relation to distance from the genus mean[/quote]

no i dont
NO I DIDNT

you did

every gene recombination..after mitosis
must survive..the same genus specific audit
via the 3 mechanmisms i previously raised on this issue

[quote]This is a testable hypothesis.[/quote]

ok sure
its your thesis

why not let you bust it

lol

[quote]]First you...would have to
define what the 'genus mean' is,[/quote]

see previous links
your the expert..tell us lord master

the genusd mean is the limits
where eucalypts stop being eucalypts
or bacteria stop being bacteria
or pigs stop being pigs
ot dogs stop beinmg dogs

[quote]and how you would measure 'distance'.[/quote]
[in inxches..fet or meters
but
its nothing to do with distance

thats your theory..!
not mine..!

every breeding event
gets the same audit mechanisms

thats me

now you..trying to be 'clever'

continues

your [quote]..Then..using a simple program..
such as http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi lol..

*you could measure..both the variation..in the genetic sequence..for various genes..and well as..lol..,predict..efficacy in DNA repair mechanisms...You can do this yourself..from home.[/quote]

im over falling..for your
and ya mates redirections
you had a link to baffle em with bs

you had some link
now you put up..a link..
and explain...your own lies..away as mine

lol

then high on your own cleverness

[quote]4...You should also state
how any species..would 'know'..the 'genus mean'[/quote]

one minute
im asked to explain genus
next..you try to hit me..with explaining it to you..lol

your the profesing person
calling evolution out of genus..as valid

its up to you
to validate your theory

not redirect lies
and what you hope make me go away

more devious destractive
redirection/spin

[quote]..and their respective distance..from it.[/quote]

sarcasicly
guess that depends
on how long..the mate is from his member

remember member mate
every new life..beginning event
resets the audit clock

each of the same genus
will have the correct timing

or
ooops
dead end
extinction

work with the living
not the dead

[quote]..If this theory is correct
then evidence..for these measurements
would exist..in the genome.[/quote]

stop measuring
begin naming..who what when where how..!

are you..a science major or lit?

sure ol pal spin
its your theory

if you got names
mechanisms..present them
and stop measuring your best...lol..'distance'

it makes you go blind