Come on, lets get to the point. You believe in god in the absence of any evidence for its existence. No amount of evidence will convince you that the theory of evolution is correct as this incompatible with your beliefs.

Stop being a hypocrite and apply evidence-based thought to your own beliefs.

stezza..mate..i got plenty of proof
that you..got no proof..!

its your theory*
you..supply the fact..to prove it

its not for me..to disprove..
cause you arnt..close to being right

NOT ONE CHANGE..OF GENUS
has ever been reported..nor recorded..nor proven..EVER!

only the godless..need some reason..thus flog a THEORY
implying..lol,,if you dont get it..your the ignorant one

[and human nature..is lazy
they prefer..to be..with the 'in' crowd
as dumb pigs..love to hide..in the clever sheep

yet they only follow deciete...or rather
a THEORY,..that excludes god

but..back to finshing you off

""Evidence suggests..that a semi-autonomous transcriptional network..
acts in concert..with the CDK-cyclin machinery..to regulate the..*cell cycle...""

""..Several..gene-expression..studies..in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
have identified..approximately..800 to 1200 genes..that change expression..over the course/of..the cell-cycle;""

your rote job..[breeding..and destroying..*bacteria
ie..only making rna/dna..by killing..living-cells..for killings sake

with no intrest..beyond switching..genes..on or off..
[and nothing..to do with cell..except destroying them..to get your dna/rna]

continue quote..gene expression..""they..are transcribed..at high levels..at specific points..in the cell-cycle,..''

and dead
once you disolved away..all the cell-organics
to obtain..the dna/rna..dead dna

here..are some of..the cells tricks
you might use..in your..rote process/replications...

masking as..lol..science

""Several methods..can be used..to synchronise..*cell cultures
by halting the..*cell cycle..at a particular phase.

For example,..serum starvation..and treatment with thymidine
or aphidicolin..halt the cell..in the G1 phase,

mitotic shake-off,..treatment with colchicine..
and treatment with nocodazole..halt the cell in M phase..

and treatment..with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine..halts the cell..in S phase.

lest we forget
we got..acids..and alcaloids

[opposing sides..to the same
acidifying/de-acidification process]

never-the-less
dna/rna..are instructions..*not life

..just dont be supprised..in the next life
when they..repeatedly..disolve your..'organic bits..
and replicate..only your..dna..[karma]

endlessly...or untill you wakeup..
and realise..the destructivness of all..
you so thoughtlessly..have done..by rote..to other

recall the law
more of the same..[as what you gave]..
shall be given..little wonder..you decry..the law/of karmic..comback and god

you decieve others
worse..you decieve them..into believing..*a theory
ie a hope/opinion...idea..to wit a lie..[if..you cant prove it true..]

worse..you hide behind..a mask of experteaze
claiming the respect..due to those..doing research..to find truths

when in truth..only doing..party-tricks..
to impress kiddies..into faulse-theories

bah
talk..is cheap
invent something
validate proof..into your theory..of wind

reveal faulsifyables..

one under god,

? D 'obvius ut operias, ut productio ligni et mobilis illi et moribus L'? remotio introëuntibus vobis, promitto tibi? [Afeteroy] causam inducens views caeli? Fingunt d 'colant scientificus - L gradu tuo? Est consuetudo in disciplinis doctrinarum examine, a te scelerate L? eruditio English. Does your observationem docet / Science ostendo vos teneo? T est et scientifica methodo? , Quod scientia in particulari quid sit faciendum Rereaktion nec eget ante in quam tu tibi verba in eo loco scripta sunt in eo plus ego nunc vitam. Tertio tu? ; Cum Reobsession muzzles amet, consectetur psycho aliqua. Vos mos animadverto a elit. Etiam nec dolor? ; Dixeris? Hoc mendacium ... et [fyres] non? T sprechen amittere formam? Mauris vere t (aut satis). Postremo tu? : Unus descendit Rebildenweise facti regulares. Quare "facies? T somno facias eum 'd? Vel si sobrius es? Et tamen vicit?' Est rationale: [Kath] disco magis ueri simile proferre, washer exiguam purpurrotere elit.

If you aim to convince me (or others) to change their mind, then you must propose an alternative theory. So far you have refused to do that. Is it because it relies on your faith in the existence of a creator? Simply state your alternative theory. Why is it so difficult?

Stezza, his alternate theories come from the pseudo science at www.creation.com. only he won't admit it.

From the article:

"Like antisepsis, many scientific truths began as heresies and fought long battles for acceptance against entrenched establishment wisdom that now appears irrational: continental drift, for example. Barry Marshall was not just ignored but vilified when he first argued that stomach ulcers are caused by a particular bacterium. Antacid drugs were very profitable for the drug industry. Eventually he won the Nobel prize.

Just this month Daniel Shechtman won the Nobel prize for quasi crystals, having spent much of his career being vilified and exiled as a crank. “I was thrown out of my research group. They said I brought shame on them with what I was saying.”

That’s lesson number 4: the heretic is sometimes right."

Hence my handle...