The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific heresy > Comments
Scientific heresy : Comments
By Matt Ridley, published 4/11/2011How do you tell the difference between science and pseudoscience using global warming as an example.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Friday, 11 November 2011 8:17:59 PM
| |
Poirot,
"it's endlessly fascinating, etc...." Ahh, repetition - the last refuge of the idiot. Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Friday, 11 November 2011 10:41:41 PM
| |
vucu..has this endless facination of dna
""OUG The missing link is right under your nose if you look at some of my references...It is called DNA. dear David you mix your metahores dna is not any missing link but heck lets ask the occultlite.. to explain the chemical base pairing..chemicly but i know even as i say this..no reply to that will be forthcumming just like her last reply ignored everything except her attack mode on pure o but heck mr voc u...lets hear about the dna.. lol being the missing link...[the missing link from what to what] which dna..[specificly] or maybe the why of the dna filling in that missing but heck i know your [and the occo-lite's words are just psssing in the wind] im not even going to try to think how dna relates to global warming Posted by one under god, Saturday, 12 November 2011 5:46:21 AM
| |
The Acolyte Rizla,
"...the last refuge of the idiot." hmmm....if that's an example of your best wit, I suppose I should congratulate you (although there's room for improvement IMO) We have a few posters on OLO who regularly resort to insults and name-calling as a demonstration of their superior "quality". However, most of us manage to get by without recourse to such rhetoric - you should challenge yourself and try it sometime. :) Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 12 November 2011 10:29:21 AM
| |
one under god,
I am lorem ligula in statu MORBOSUS base in vobis. Insolitae mihi, nobilis. Respondeo l 'Tantum modo secundum operationem in tantum brabbeltaal, elephante. In virga tua et ex pulls pipio. Poirot, If you undertake a more thorough examination of my posts, you'll note that I do no resort to insults and name-calling as a matter of course - it only ever occurs as a result of provocation. What better description than 'idiot' (or a synonym of idiot) is there for somebody who advances a weak argument, has it soundly rebutted, and then repeats it word for word as though it had never been rebutted? Or for somebody who persistently posts in gibberish, even after people have politely pointed out a number of times that nobody save the poster can understand it? If the shoe fits... Furthermore, it's impossible to have a proper argument with people who indulge in that sort of behaviour. And unfortunately, 'Argument Clinics' only exist in Monty Python sketches: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y&noredirect=1 So I have to make do with debating clubs and websites like this and such like. It's immensely frustrating when you're trying to have a good argument (a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition) and your opponent(s) consistently refuse to argue their case properly. If other folk around here aren't interested in the services of room 12 (argument), I'm happy to direct them to room 12A (abuse). But if they don't want to be insulted, there's a simple and obvious remedy: don't do anything to warrant an insult. Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Saturday, 12 November 2011 11:25:57 AM
| |
Garbled Latin with a bit of swedish thrown in. Yes.
Posted by 579, Saturday, 12 November 2011 12:21:54 PM
|
How absolutely spiffing for you!
As I said, it's endlessly fascinating, etc....