The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific heresy > Comments
Scientific heresy : Comments
By Matt Ridley, published 4/11/2011How do you tell the difference between science and pseudoscience using global warming as an example.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
"That was better"
Not really, it's still mostly Greek to me.
one under god,
"cause my science words cant be folowed"
What science words? An awful lot of the contents of your posts aren't even words, let alone 'science words'.
"by fools ignorant of science terms/meanings"
Again, this is NOT the problem. My background is in chemistry; I am familiar with many scientific terms and their meanings. I don't have trouble following your posts because of the technical terms you employ; I have trouble following them because of your consistent refusal to observe simple conventions of the English language. That doesn't make you special or clever or a visionary, and it doesn't make us ignorant or foolish - all it does is make you functionally illiterate, which has the knock-on effect of making you look like a halfwit. I mean really, how difficult is it to construct a sentence? Primary school kids can manage it. Are you stupider than a fifth-grader?