The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific heresy > Comments
Scientific heresy : Comments
By Matt Ridley, published 4/11/2011How do you tell the difference between science and pseudoscience using global warming as an example.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by Formersnag, Thursday, 10 November 2011 5:49:08 PM
| |
Formersnag,
you forgot to mention the sheep (like you) blindly led by your precious protestantism and its work ethic, by libertarianazism (if I may indulge your love of neologisms), consumerism, patriotism and all the other closed-minded claptrap the suckers suck up. Posted by Squeers, Thursday, 10 November 2011 6:38:18 PM
| |
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12844#222092
Squeers, i have commented far enough before, for you to know that i do NOT blindly follow anybodies clap trap. christian or political, left or right. EG, i also am not too fond of either libertarianism or consumerism. BIG business is just as evil as BIG government & unions. international banksters are just as evil as their international socialist friends. Posted by Formersnag, Thursday, 10 November 2011 6:47:46 PM
| |
OUG. I have to concur with The Acolyte Rizla.
If you use some normal English sentence construction, your posts would be more easily understood. Some of us might even get to agree with you on some points, but your disjointed text is difficult to follow, even by those of us with a better than normal grasp of the language. David Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 10 November 2011 9:56:31 PM
| |
the pool has become too poluted..
by those blogging the same old thing's govt adgendas..corperate spin..paid to blog playing the man not the words they claim highers wisdoms..yet cant find even one concept in my words to refute thus clearly are more ignorant than their own words..limited spell checked words reveal to say your higher brain cant find one logic in an insane rave.. well that explains why you fell for scientific here/say cause my science words cant be folowed by fools ignorant of science terms/meanings its easier to say im the problem not nor self rightous ignorances you only need to ignore me for a few more weeks then you will be happy to know..im gone no web server..no web acces so be ignorant all you like i will post as long as i can you can complain long after im gone believe decieve all you like then... till then i will rub your nose in your own ignorances and laugh at how ignorant your own words reveal the pair of ya to be ha ha Posted by one under god, Friday, 11 November 2011 6:56:02 AM
| |
OUG That was better, at least now we understand where you are coming from. Enjoy your solitude, we might even miss you.
David Posted by VK3AUU, Friday, 11 November 2011 7:27:46 AM
|
Suseonline, hmmm? psuedoscience? try these,
http://anhonestclimatedebate.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/the-delinquent-teenager-who-was-mistaken-for-the-worlds-top-climate-expert/ a book written by a woman no less, on "doctored" psuedo-science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzNwjfbVt-U&feature=related more psuedoscience, exposed by the atheists NEW god Dawkins?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-287163572862203022#docid=7924466177269730495 both Flannery & many feMANazis believe in this god?
Are we sure "environMENTALism" & loony left wing politics are not new religions?
They both have large numbers of "sheeple" blindly, dogmatically, following the gospels according to Marx, Lenin, Mao, Marcuse, Greer, Flannery, Brown, the RED/green, getup, GAYLP/alp, Socialist Alliance, etc, etc, etc.