The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific heresy > Comments
Scientific heresy : Comments
By Matt Ridley, published 4/11/2011How do you tell the difference between science and pseudoscience using global warming as an example.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
bah
..""Terms like "trick" were deliberately made sinister""
mate if you trick up the data
OR HIDE THE FACTS..thats lying
""and the implication of cheating
was repeated loud and often.""
it wernt 'implicated' ol mate..it is fact
they said trick up the data
""Most trades have "tricks",""lol
""and it is not uncommon to use the term!"'
i never heard it before
thus it is a spin term
sounding better than change the data
""The "confirmation bias" based on these non-proofs seem to be endlessly repeated, just like WMDs in Iraq, despite any proof to the contrary.""
if there is a bias..for others
to take your money
they will invest in it
tiklkl your bled dry
LEST WE FORGET
c02 increased 5%..this year alone,,!
globally it will keep rising
no mater how much tax aussies end up paying
over 1 trillion 2020..not a bad govt bailout
for the carbon traders.[new age money changers]..
taxing breathing out c02
tax air?
huh..?
carbon isnt a polutant
trippling the cost of our energy..is insane
if you want to cut polution..stop putting methane into the air
[ie stop homecomposting and worm farming..
and growing meat in heated sheds..feeding them on grain..
give them grass...thats solid c02..suspended in water..H20]