stezza...we coverd these topic many times
from many aspects

athiest's
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4698&page=0
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4683&page=0

spitual athiesm
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12050&page=0

species
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4591&page=0
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4225&page=0
religeon/evolution

evolution
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11112&page=0
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4568&page=0
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4556&page=0
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4579&page=0

morality
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11163&page=0

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11008&page=0

so i started my own topic
asking evolutionists only please
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=3124&page=0

which has many more links
it continued at
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2411&page=0

but lets look at your proof

tezzra
name the first life
name what it evolved into

give me the proof
for even one evolution..*OUT of genus
into a new genus..name names or admit

you got faith in the THEORY
of evolution..not proof

ie you got not one proof..for your faith in science
thus have only exchanged one belief SYSTEM..with an other
or else you would present it..[name names mate..]

So climate science is about as well understood as evolutionary science?

Yep, I can live with that .. I think we assume in too many areas, that we know more than we do. Admitting we don't know as much though, is not a good look on grant applications, nor on scientific papers, the currency of promotions and glory in the scientific world.

I do wonder what climate scientists in 100 years will think of our current scientists and their political penchant.

The more I see and read on climate science, the more I realize it is in its infancy.

The way i see it is only time that will find the outcome for climate science. A very good interpretation of why cyclonic action is happening in other places, not usually targeted.[ Middle east on line.] Directly blames the pollution created by pakistan china and a few others in the region, for causing a pollution cloud, which curtailed the usual pattern of cyclone dampening to occur. The mid east has been usually spared cyclonic action, even though it is hot enough to occur.

OUG,

I'm not interested in supplying you with further evidence. We will never know everything, so there will always be gaps. As long as there are gaps you will point to them as your 'evidence'. I have refuted many of your arguments as well as clearly teaching you about the arbitrary classification system developed my man, including the term and meaning of 'genus'. Yet you seem incapable of learning. Did you watch the video I linked to? Yes the orangutan is you.

I didn't expect you to state your beliefs/theory, I don't believe you know what you are talking about, and are not even close to being capable of developing an alternative theory. That is the challenge, put up or shut up.

one under god,

Nope, that didn't clear things up at all. Try using sentences, and if you can manage it, paragraphs.

Evolutionary theory has got far more explaining power than climate science. Interestingly enough, neither Darwin nor Wallace were government funded. If they were, no doubt they would have come up with a theory that we're all going to die unless government gets a big new tax and powers to control everything.

OUG
"I haven't got the faintest idea what you are trying to argue."

Me neither.

"Might I suggest that you brush up on your literacy skills?"

Me too.