The Norwegian murderer did not have a father in his life at all.

As with almost all western nations, the natural father was summarily barred by the family court from his life.
Thus the Norwegian murderer grew up without a meaningful relationship with his father. Any father in fact!

He was raised in a single mother home, where feminism was shoved down his throat and the male that hooked up with his mother, was busy off with other women too. This male was no father figure!

Just because the mother gets herself a boyfriend or another husband, that does not mean that the child/ren have a new father. This is one typical and deliberate error feminists and womens groups make all the time. They claim any male that comes into the home of a single mother, is a father. Well, they are totally wrong using the term father to any other male, until that male behaves like a father, can he only then be given a similar name, like Step-father. Outside of that, any dog that turns up to the single mothers house for sex, is not a fathers bootlace.

I feel sorry that your family suffered in those days. But just because you are bitter over those days, does not mean that your situation was the norm. It actually wasn't the norm. Your past experience is what happens a lot today, not back then.

And yes, feminism is the cause of many evils in our society. But what you say about the men who also aided in the introduction of all these family and societal destructive changes to our lives is true, and these men will likewise have to face up to what they have done.

I don't excuse evil men from what they have done. And I am most certainly not going to excuse evil women for what they do. But I will never agree that in 2011 we are now better off than before, because we are worse off today than we have ever been in human history.

And it is getting worse by the day!

Paw -- you DO realise, I take it, that Breivik is a card-carrying Christian? And he's managed to exterminate quite a few 'nuclear families', all by himself.

Huh!

I'm sorry, I don't follow what you are saying.

I do not support this murderer in any way shape or form. So, please if you have any need to address any of his behaviour, then you will need to ask him. In this sad case, my support lies with the families, who have lost innocent family members.

My point in the argument, was to show how crime is out of control, now that we have a largely fatherless society.

I can assure you Paw that Australians are better off today than they have ever been, and without the help of religeon.

We'd be better off looking and the family background of religious and political Martyrs than spree killers, though the introduction to this article is really only "HITLER!....now that we have your attention".
Are all Jihadists and suicide bombers from fatherless homes?
I doubt it.
Breivik is motivated by his environment and civic role models rather than familial examples.
He's been in bad company, specifically bad online company in the form of the Extreme Right Wing Zionists.
Breivik listened to fanatical extremists who only want to use and exploit people to whom they have no loyalty or kinship.
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-was-the-massacre-in-norway-a-reaction-to-bds.html
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-massacre-in-norway-more-about-the-jewish-right.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDr6SjPMRzs&skipcontrinter=1

Children need BOTH NATURAL parents... Statistically speaking, by-and-large, typically, on average etc.

A 'father figure' typically means a string of mummies-new-boyfriends is the worst situation for a child - worse than no male at all (statistically speaking/typically etc).

Please note how most of the people disagreeing with Warwick simply insult him, or point out a single exception.

Good work as always Warwick.