RObert I have no Axe to grind in fact chainsmoker is quite right the forum has the most important roll to play.
I however have tried to forgive some things said over a long period, and without doubt have entered into debate with at least 2 different posters under the pale banner.
Just finding this out in the past week, I got on quite well with the person born in Kempsy.
But that is clearly not the main user of the name.
I do not find my roll in this thread or others any worse than some of pales, and yes I understand the false claim about me was done not knowing its full impact, but it was a low blow.
Not a true debating ploy, to try to find fault with me not my posts.
It is best we do not prolong the debate, it however has been one that had over 60 posts so far, interest was above average.
And RObert while you and I live on opposing sides of politics I do think your post was well thought out,did no harm, and has points that call for attention.
Some charges laid against you again take debate and truth into deep mud, such debate hurts only those who use it and puts a spotlight on why such claims are used as debating points.
May I say just this animals need protection always this last few weeks has not convinced me pale best represents them.

Wouldn't it be simpler if whoever posts here as PALE just signed off with their name or nickname when making personal comments that are not made on behalf of the organisation?

Seems to me that would get rid of much of the angst some people seem to be suffering.

SPANKY
Be proud shake the hand of the person working
for that export company.
www.livexports.com

Poor Graham
Dont worrying how pale runs.
Lets `all` show consideration.

Ginx – Agreed- yes it IS a privilege. One we need to protect.
PALE is only registered NFP to enable us to seek Volunteers.


Morgan
You call me racist but we are the only group in Australia to have formed a MOU with Muslim Leaders. You support the Greens. Same here. I am German born and I do get spelling incorrect. This is a very old RSPCA QLD computer and word spell does not work often.
Lets try harder to respect all.

David -
"Eccentric" aye :)
Posted by BOAZ David, Sunday, 9 September 2007 8:37:22 AM
To be eccentric is a compliment. So you and I will wear it as a badge of pride.
You’re a good person who will be crucified by many.
Your concerned about the rise in Islamic extremist’s world wide and rightfully so. Don’t ever think law abiding Australian Muslims will hold that against you. [[most]
I feel honoured the Lord chose me as one of his servants to help his creatures.
I `utterly detest ` the hypocrisy of the Ministers and Church leaders of Australia who have remained silent in the face of such atrocities to our Animals.

We will continue to highlight the lack of concern by Churches and Church Leaders towards Animal Welfare.
. – And thanks! Boazie.

Belly.
You take everything personally.
Thanks for explaining your position.
We are from the same paddock.
Look at the web see the X Federal leader of the AMIEU. So we are not Anti Labour people. Just anti people exporting our raw materials jobs and acts of animal cruelty.
You have to except we have a job to do. Howard cops worse.
I enjoy your comments and sorry but you make us laugh.
Good luck for the elections


Robert. I have only one question. How did you manage to get your picture up under – Find the Perfect office space that’s right for you/
Funny As.

Antje, I tried to make sense of your question but have not managed to do so. Perhaps a rephrase is in order (or if other posters understood it they may be able to enlighten me). If it is a legitimate question relevant to my involvement on OLO I will attempt to answer it.

Now I'll have another go at my questions to you. I changed the phrasing to try and make it clearer.

1/ Do posts appearing under the name of "People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming" represent the views of that organisation or are they the views of the person making the post (presumably you)?

For question 2 pick the question relevant to the answer given in "1"
2a/ If they are your own views then how is People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming defamed or criticised when people respond to the contents of those posts?
2b/ If they are the views of People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming (the orgainsation) why should that organisation be exempt from criticism or rebuttal of those views expressed on a public forum?

R0bert

RObert I am full to over flowing with questions not unlike the ones you put above.
In several threads today and last night I put views that did not appear to get an answer I too am baffled by the idea that my membership of a ham radio club was funny?
I have visited past threads to question my memory about conversations with some one other than the poster you mention as pale ,and I can confirm it took place.
Let me however explain some things in another way.
Last night I spoke on ham radio,just maybe I am free next weekend not on duty.
Every bit of information I gave the other person saw him ask me to repeat.
It is fact ,and strange that some want to be heard but do not listen, some want to be read but do not fully read others posts or understand them.

"The latest posts from Ginx must be from an imposter. They were sensibly written with no 'sighs', 'umms' or other stupid exclamations and 'deliberate spelling mistakes'. The usual lack of logic was lacking.

This just couldn't be my wee Ginx."
Posted by JSP1488, Sunday, 9 September 2007 4:58:13 PM

Every poster has stuck to the topic of this thread. Except you.

All that you had to contribute here was to have yet another shot at me. That's it. No opinion on the thread topic; just using it for sarcasm to an individual who has no connection to the thread title.

It is highjacking the thread for your own purposes. If you want to continue to take me on; do it on the 'Oz Culture' thread as you have been doing.

Sorry Robert.