I just started watched a live YouTube stream that focuses on Assange and the many issues related to him if anyone wants something to watch.

BREAKING: Top Ukrainian Military Official LASHES OUT At Zelensky Adviser
http://youtu.be/f93RewJnNHA

You can easily pull the red playback slider thingy back to the beginning and watch it too, if anyone wishes to do so.
In the video, from the beginning Jackson Hinkle immediately discusses Assange.

Dear Fester,

«If Jules goes to the US, he will face a trial in an impartial court and...»

Maybe, maybe not - he would be an idiot if he did. I just wouldn't take my chances, same for all I ever said and wrote about China and Russia, I don't take any chances, I've never been there and never willingly ever place my foot there (nor even transit again via Hong-Kong airport).

---

Dear Ttbn,

«You have most likely done nothing to be jailed for.»

Well legally speaking I have, and so I believe each and every adult person on this earth, including, if nothing else, for breaking laws they were not even aware of. For starters, I did not report to the regime when I had COVID (well I actually did report, but only anonymously through a friend so they still have their numbers right to plan for hospital and ICU spots, but not my name): I did isolate at home for 9 days, but never told those bastards about my positive RAT. By law, they could jail me for that. Could you find me ANYONE who never ever broke any COVID regulation, who never visited a friend or a relative when not allowed, or perhaps too many of them, or perhaps only got a haircut illegally or exercised outside more than the time allowed during lockdown?

As I was driving earlier today, I took the slightly longer route to avoid driving past a jail. It just depresses me to think of all the tormented people suffering inside and pass through this gloom bad energy. I find this barbaric practice cruel and inhumane, cruel for cruelty sake and out of sync with spiritual principles.

Fortunately, so long, God protected me from jail and I pray He always will. I put my trust in God and His eternal and just law, not in people and their stupid arbitrary laws. I can also confidently say that whenever I was a "victim" of crime, I know in my heart of hearts that I fully deserved it.

Fester,
The Canadian would have been subject to Canadian law and therefore subject to trial in that jurisdiction for murder.
Joyce was born in Ireland, became a U S citizen but renounced that citizenship, he was not at the time that he worked for the Nazis a British citizen, therefore they had no jurisdiction.
Britain murdered Joyce just as they had judiciously murdered many others.
Joyce’s greatest crime was being a figure of fun inBritain, hence “Lord Haw Haw” as a nickname.
Joyce did have a British passport, which he obtained pre-war under false pretences, to wit: he lied, the penalty for which was a fine, instead they hanged him in revenge.
Judicial murder.

I did not read all the posts this time, so others might already have said that:
Julian has not offended against Britain to any serious extent.
He did not do physical harm any of them?
All he did was attempt survival in a hostile environment.
Why should Britain be arbitrarily deciding the fate of Julian?
What has it to do with them?
They need to return him to Australia, and we will deal with his offences, if any.

I also have the idea that ALL the people are entitled to know EXACTLY what their government is doing.
It cannot be an offence for any person to have such information?
How else can we assess and decide the suitability of a government.
This concept of a 'cloak of secrecy' is absurd.
If it is so bad that it has to be kept 'under wraps' forever, then they shouldn't be doing it.
We mustn't allow any person in any government to undermine the freedom we have to know what they are up to.
It is not only right that we should know, it is absolutely necessary.

Ipso Facto,
Governments need secrecy, especially in diplomacy and trade, it’s not the secrecy that is the problem but the illegal acts that some Governments do that is the problem.

Is Mise,

Propaganda is a weapon of war. I don't think less of the Brits for hanging the bugger after the war, but times change. Hanoi Jane has never been tried for treason in the US, and that was over fifty years ago.

So I'd be charged with murder in Canada, but how does that work if the murders were committed outside Canadian jurisdiction? Would that make Jules a law breaker in the country he was in when Wikileaks released the information about the foreign operatives and informants?