Most of the media we watch on TV and in the news is all generic mockingbird media, it's all the same and parrots a single talking point and narrative.
The few genuine people that are out there trying to do real journalism and report an unbiased truth are attacked, demonetised, de-platformed, or even worse held to account and prosecuted for acting illegally based on the laws of our own governments.

Just last night the team George Webb is affiliated with were all held up at gunpoint (12 witnesses) and had their server and laptop stolen and held ranson by someone who apparently is trying to extort them.

I don't buy the extortion claim.
He was getting too close reporting on those Ukrainian biolabs.
How did the armed intruder know they had a server and not web-hosting?
Why would you risk an armed intrusion on 12 people just for extortion money?
How did they know they didn't have the data backed up and would even be willing to pay?

That's the reason their site is now out of action...
http://www.neighborhoodnewsstudio.com/

Incidentally, if anyone saw the video I shared a few weeks ago, this was the website hosting the video where George connected Rothschilds to Kolomoisky, via Gregoire Chertok and Larisa Chertok
I did mention it 2 weeks ago, (link below) but cant find the actual link to the 2 comments where I added the link to George's video where he himself mentioned it.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=9825&page=0#334573

http://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b14zbl0qxk6g6j/grgoire-chertok-plays-banker-to-frances-elite
"Grégoire Chertok’s favorite place may be the inside of a cinema, but nothing gets the Rothschild & Cie. partner’s blood rushing like a big takeover."

http://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/oligarch-toys-planes-palaces-other-posh-possessions.html
"Igor Kolomoisky shares Damir Akhmetov’s admiration for Lake Geneva. However, Kolomoisky’s lakeside villa — registered under the name of his sister Larisa Chertok — is much smaller."

Fester,
Only if what he did was a crime in that country, murder is a crime in Canada, he plotted it in Canada and controlled the device used from that country
Paedophiles who engage in sex with underage children in foreign countries, even though it is lawful there.can be charged under our law when they enter our jurisdiction but only if they are Australian citizens.
If they are not Australian citizens then they can only be deported/refused entry.

Nice to see that you think the execution of an innocent man is OK if his offending actions upset you.

Hope you don’t do jury service.

A University of Oxford blog back in 2010 published an
interesting article on "WikiLeaks - rights and wrongs."

To which someone responded with the following:

" Wikileaks has posted to its website only 960
of the 251.297 diplomatic cables that it has. Almost
every one of these cables were first published by one
of its newspaper partners which are disclosing them
(The Guardian, the NYT, El Pais, Le Monde, Der Speigel).

More over the cables posted by WikiLeaks were not only
first published by these newspapers, but contain the
redactions applied by these papers to protect innocent
people and otherwise minimize harm."

So why is only Assange the one being charged?

And can a publisher be held accountable for the conduct
of others in providing crucial information to the public?

Here's the University of Oxford blog:

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2010/12/wikileaks-rights-and-wrongs/

"Nice to see that you think the execution of an innocent man is OK if his offending actions upset you."

Joyce was not innocent. Propaganda made Germans feel that genocide was reasonable conduct. It made Russian soldiers feel okay about committing war crimes against Ukrainian civilians. You assume the Brits were unjust and brutal in hanging Joyce, but maybe they knew a little more about propaganda than you? Maybe propaganda is the devil that whispers in your ear?

Fester,

Suggest that you read a little about the Joyce case.
He was tried on three counts for High Treason and found Not Guilty on two, on the third count he was found guilty because he was holding a British Passport, had he approached a British Legation for a handout and they found that he’d lied to get the passport then he’d have got nothing, they would not have considered him a British subject.
So how could they hang him on the same lie?
Only if the British Government was prepared to commit murder.

Assange's case is no different, he is an Australian citizen (however much we wish he weren’t) and as such the British Government has no jurisdiction over him except for crimes committed against the law of Bfitain.
They certainly have no right to deport him to a country that has no jurisdiction over him.