mhaze, you substituted India for Bengal. I said no wheat was delivered to Bengal during the Bengal Famine 1943. It was a British government directive which prevented grain shipments to Bengal. You're the so called expert, provide evidence. Such a pillock.

Dear Paul1405,

He is indeed a right pillock but an entertaining one at least.

Dear mhaze,

More than happy to address other matters but not at the expense of giving you an out on this beautiful own goal of yours.

This is what you have put:

Quote

Its SOP for SR to falsify quotes in the hope that his false narrative will get through. You'd think he'd learn that it never works with me, but he tries anyway. Here's the rest of the quote that SR tried to hide....

"When comparing across countries, the only countries in which we observe the introduction of SIP policies negatively changes the
trajectory of excess deaths are Australia, Malta, and New Zealand. All three countries are islands. In every other country, we observe either no visual change in excess deaths or increases in excess deaths. The results are similar for U.S. states. We observe small reductions in excess deaths for Hawaii, which is also an island, following the implementation of a SIP policy."

Ethics are weak in this one.

End quote.

Firstly the fact you are accusing me of falsifying quotes when I did no such thing is a deep reflection on your personal ethics which have never been a shining example of probity on this forum.

Next your unabashed hypocrisy is blatant if not a little bizarre to the ordinary folk.

It was you who left out the quote about lockdowns working in Australia when you posted and quoted from your link.

Why did you try and hide such a damning piece of evidence? Because it didn't suit your narrative.

So how about an answer you mendacious troller, do you admit that lockdowns worked in Australia as per your study or not?

I am more than happy to acknowledge us being an island certainly assisted in their effectiveness but without the lockdowns Covid would have had a devastating impact in a pre-vaccinated Australia.

How about a poll.

Is SR
A/ Press secretary for a labor politician.
B/ Apprentice press secretary for a lefty think tank.

I have been pondering this for a while, but can't decide.

Hi Hasbeen,

SR is ethical and civil-minded.
He has integrity, patience, confidence, and
is a great communicator. He has great inter-personal
communication skills. He treats people with respect.

He has the qualities of a great leader.
Passion, teamwork, and social skills, all are necessary
to be effective - and SR has that in spades.

Hassy, do you still want to NUK 200 million Pakistani men, women and children as you once posted on the Forum. You also posted that the Australian Navy should open fire with 50mm rounds on unarmed refugee boats carrying, defenceless women and children, a real man. Don't be gutless, say what you mean, if you still support those murderous acts.

SR would be nobody's secretary.

He'd be the man in charge.