Hey Robert
You seem to have singled out our organisation.
Well thats ok thanks for the PR.
I think this started on the thread with the young single mum when either one of you could understand that partners move on.

All I was trying to say on that thread Robert was you can not dicate to others where they live espeically when there is a second marraige and othe children from that marriage to consider.

I said you can not dicate- Not you dictate Robert.

However given your response I then was forced to say some x wives and husbands seem to be control freaks.

I said you sounded a bit that way.

Now your really angry.- Hense get PALE at all costs!

It was not my intention to upset you so I apolgise if it did.

I was attempting to display to yourself and V that there are others to consider as you wanted a new law to stop parents from leaving the area or they would loose their children.

We are very local about cruelty to Animals- Yes.

We make no apoligies for that.

Put your efforts into something else or please feel free to contiune to attack an organisation who unlike some is not just obbessed with themselves.
Sorry off post to everybody else.

PS Morgan is Morgan and I am sure he makes up a part of OLO.
Hes unique just like you.
Why do you have to control others actions all the time. Hes bagged me but thats ok Robert.
Live and let live.

Sorry, Boaz, you are still missing the point.

>>[me]"...you behave precisely as those whom you accuse."

[you] No..I do not put 'Crosses' over Parliament house in photos. Nor do I trample on our national flag in public places<<

Apart from these exceptions...? So, you have slightly better manners when you denigrate and vilify. Big deal.

>>What you missed out on P, is that the vid of the "Islamic Thinkers Society" is coming from a "Hizb Ut Tahrir" world Kalifate perspective<<

Boaz, if a dozen people walk up and down Bourke Street Mall waving banners that say "we will conquer the world", how seriously would you take them? If a bunch of noisy Islamic militants make the same noise on the Internet, how seriously would you take them?

It is the easiest thing in the world to distribute hateful propaganda. YouTube is a classic example of how technology has created new opportunities for the dissemination of information in a most immediate and dramatic form.

However, the medium does not change the message.

Militant Islam is a threat to you and me only in the most peripheral way. I sincerely hope that those who are entrusted with our security take the threat from religious fanatics - of any persuasion - seriously, as they seem to be the single most dangerous category right now.

And their movements - all of them - are fed by the hatred generated from their perceived opponents. Their aggression can be excused, in their eyes, by portraying it as a fight for survival.

And that is precisely where you come in, Boaz.

You are intent on perpetuating the story that your religion is under attack, so that you can justify the hatred you stir up against its opponents.

>>You see the raising of awareness of this, as mischief making (my goodness, you are already using Islamic technical terminology ...<<

"Mischief-making" is Islamic technical terminology?

Rubbish. It is good, old-fashioned English terminology, and you are not going to hijack it for your own devious ends.

PALE, no attack on your organisation. It's your choice to use the organisations name as your online name, that does not give you the excuse to pretend that any reference to your own online behaviour is an attack on your organisation.

What was addressed in that post was your double standard in criticising CJ Morgan for personal attacks while your own posts often include personal attacks on others. I attempted to do so in a light hearted manner. There was a faint hope that you might consider what you had written in your post to CJ and the contents of your other posts and give a profound apology to CJ Morgan. Also a bigger hope that I might provide some amusement to other posters.

Not particularly angry, well and truly over your passion for double standards.

R0bert

Robert.
PALE would also like to add that we have found many of your comments very worth while.
You have made a difference quite often to the way in which we have seen something or even handled something.
You have always been the first to show compassion especially to new comers.
I totally agree its not nice to personally attack anybody.
I would also like to apoligise if I said something on the other thread that you found offensive.
Now I will be really in the poo for getting so off post with the others.
Morgan just remember its as easy to say something nicely as it is to make personal attacks.
I can see your not big on graceful posts but try to understand people will respond to you as you do them.
Both yourself and Robert are valued posters to pale.
Sorry for off post guys

Thanks R0bert. While I had noticed the irony in being chastened by one of OLO's most frequently intemperate frootloops, those links reminded me of how wrong s/he had got you in those 'control freak' posts. I for one was amused, as I often am by the sheer nuttiness of PALE's contributions that we all mostly ignore, but sometimes s/he posts something so ridiculous I can't help responding.

Speaking of nutty comments,

Boazy: "You see the raising of awareness of this, as mischief making (my goodness, you are already using Islamic technical terminology and the next part of the verse which mentions 'mischief' also calls for crucifying the perpetrators of mishief. Err..that wasn't a veiled threat was it ?"

Ah yes, I'm sure that 'mischief making' is a technical term derived from the hadiths or somewhere. However, why would it be written in English?

Thanks for the chuckle, you silly man :)

Robert.
Sorry I missed your post above. I get personal with the Government and the industry.
There will be no apoligies to them "ever.'
However you have pointed out I was rude to Morgan and CJ
dont recall.
Please show me the comment.
I am aware Morgan has gate crashed our threads several times just to make a rude comment or especially it would seem a personal attack at me.
I may have responded to one of those. I really to be honest do not recall.
I do recall way back Morgan [ who had not been posting on this particular thread] coming in and saying
Well I reckon the farmers are winning against you lot hands down.[ Then rushing off again]
I found that comment in particular annoying and mis leading because we are the one Animal Welfare organisation that DOES work with farmers and not against them.
I also think if you are annoyed by something I have said in a thread you should leave it to that threat and not take over another topic.
Perhaps my first observation was right.

I have left a comment on the thread that seems to have upset you so much you had to draw my attention back there.

I had thought it was best left because we really value many of your comments on OLO
Back on track .-We are delighted to inform everyone the New Mufti Of Australia has supported pre stunning of Animals for Halal.

Its a pity some of the Church leaders could not follow the same example and speak out about Kosher Slaughters .
We thank the new Mufti for his compassion to Animals and leadership.

I pray other might follow his example.