Oz

Thank you for taking the time to explain your personal experience with Muslim Leaders.

In short what you are saying is every Muslim in the world is resonsible for his and her own choices.
They in fact are the destiny of their own lives. You can choose to follow the peace of Islam or some of the more radical leaders.
This makes me feel more positive in my work.

Some Muslim Reps try to tell our Government that they refuse to have animals pre stunned before slaughter because its a religious requirment . Government reps have tried to tell Animal Welfare Agencies they can not refuse these requests because they do not wish to "offend Muslims".
You have made it clear there is no such[ one law] so its easy for us to fight for humane treatment of God creatures.
It`s simply "which leaders you choose to follow" as your guide and what the Koran Says.
So there goes John Howard and Rudds excuse for being weak gutless and poor examples of humanity.
I have met many really nice Muslim people and a few that I found insulting to be honest.
I guess that is true of everything in life isnt it Oz.
You dont judge a person by their religion but how they are as a person.
I am wondering why you gave yourself the name ALJAZEERA?
Of course its up to you if you wish to share that with me or not.


You said Muslims dont have a world leader [ at the moment] What does that mean please oZ?
Do you see them appointing one and if so who do you think that might be.
Its interesting chatting with you on OLO.
I am glad you joined us.
It does get a bit heated at times but I guess that also keeps it a bit interesting.
Thanks Again oz

BOAZ_David John Howard is not a Head of State, he is no more (constitutionally that is) but a servant to the Governor-General!

Australia has too much of a Muslim-phobia that ordinary people who happen to walk with a scarf on their head (regardless if they are not at all involved with Islam) are being taunted.
P_Dox correctly highlights that a doctor could have used biological and/or chemical weapons to cause untold harm, if that was the real intention.
Since the Tampa incident we have gone of the rails, so to say, as a society to tolerate beleaguering of refugees about “children overboard”, “terrorist coming in boats”, etc, and all we did was to invade a sovereign nation for non-existing WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, and caused more harm to Australians then anyone else could have done.
It is sickening how we as a society are picking upon people because they happen to be either or both Arab and Muslim. We should hold John Howard accountable before the Courts for unconstitutionally invading Iraq, mass murder, crimes against humanity, treason and treachery so that others may finally see that we will not allow terrorism by anyone one of our own!
See also my blog at http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QH
What is a “TERRORIST”? Constitutionally it is the prime minister who forces the Senate to vote on a Bill without allowing it to have appropriate time for debate. Now that is what the Framers of the Constitution stated! Yet, we now label people who are defending their own country to be TERRORIST, rather then resistant-fighters because politically it suits better.
It doesn’t worry me personally if a person is a Muslim, Jew, Catholic or whatever, as long as they conduct themselves within the law. If just the Federal Government respected this we may never have had Vivian Alvarez Solon, Dr. Haneef and other cases.
Currently the Federal Government is, so to say, picking on Muslims and that should be condemned!
Show respect to all people regardless of their religion.

Mr Gerrit H

Very nice comments
hope to hear from you here more

People Against Live

Thank you
ok I will answer your recent questions soon :)

Peppy

This is what you said: " The letter seemed respectful and polite and wasn't about government policy or really about Australians in general. It was mainly about one specific TV show and its influence.
What's the big deal? The PM will probably get worse letters about nudity on TV"

Peppy
I don't want to say anything to offend you, don't take me wrong but I think you are slow to understand POLITICS. Maybe you are expert for other fields but NOT POLITICS.

1. It doesn't make difference if the letter is polite or not. Actually it does make difference, when its polite it will be more effective.

2. If the PM recives many worse letters about nudity, but this letter is different with those ones, this is not just a complaint letter from a citizen about the nudity or other things on TV, this is a letter to PM from an Australian cleric , not from other people, big difference.

3. If you knew the alphabets of POLITICS , you would never say: "what's the big deal?"
It is a big deal, very big deal. Don't just look at the LETTER, see who is the sender? When it has been sent? What has been sent?
Look at the scene behind of it.

I recommend you to read it again.

You are right it is difficult to read my post,it was JPG file and not clear, maybe you have not read it properly that's why you commented like that, I should try to post again PDF.

P Dox
I agree with all of the above but as I said it would be interesting to be able to read it.
I suppose we must acknowledge they dont have our very proper English back ground and pompus either.
I dont know whats happend to Oz as I was looking forward to his reply to a couple of questions.
Perhaps he is at APEC.
`Couldnt resist` Where`s David.

People

Yeah Aljazeera_Oz is missing , he has probably been arrested for APEC lol

Or maybe BOAZ_David has reported to AFP about him lol

Peppy should know about this :)