Dear Bazz,

You write; “Mikk, there was a report of an enquiry into the Russian intervention in the their 2016 election. It found that there was no evidence.”

What an absolute utter lie. There was overwhelming evidence. Project Lakhta, yes it had its own name, was directed by Putin himself.

“The Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election with the goals of harming the campaign of Hillary Clinton, boosting the candidacy of Donald Trump, and increasing political and social discord in the United States. According to U.S. intelligence agencies, the operation — code named Project Lakhta — was ordered directly by Russian President Vladimir Putin.[1]

The Internet Research Agency (IRA), based in Saint Petersburg, Russia and described as a troll farm, created thousands of social media accounts that purported to be Americans supporting radical political groups and planned or promoted events in support of Trump and against Clinton. They reached millions of social media users between 2013 and 2017. Fabricated articles and disinformation were spread from Russian government-controlled media, and promoted on social media. Additionally, computer hackers affiliated with the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) infiltrated information systems of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), and Clinton campaign officials, notably chairman John Podesta, and publicly released stolen files and emails through DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks during the election campaign. Several individuals connected to Russia contacted various Trump campaign associates, offering business opportunities to the Trump Organization and proferring damaging information on Clinton. Russian government officials have denied involvement in any of the hacks or leaks.”

Wikipedia.

Muller found that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law". He subsequently indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations.
The Republican dominated Senate demanded strong economic sanctions be applied as a result even though Trump tried to ease them.

What part of an addled Trump infected brain of yours allows you come to the conclusion there was no evidence?

I would not trust the bigotry of SR and his supposed facts which are nothing more than unverified reports. Congress found no more evidence of Russian interference in 2016 than Chinese might have interfered in 2020. Hilary was involved in selling Uranium to Russia, why would they support Trump?

Mr. O, Trump does not need to be President to be who he is, He has his businesses to support him. Unlike Joe who has become wealthy by being vice President and using his position to garner his millions.

Josephus,

Trump inherited the family business started by grand pappy Frederick who built the best little whore house in the Yukon.

Thank heaven that we have a stable political environment and that the Capitol Riot could not happen here.

If we had one it'd need to be called something like "The Canberra Riot".

http://twitter.com/KeiraSavage00/status/1347382479871647745 (looks like you have to log in)

Good Heavens!! Where did that come from?

Issy you backed a loser in Trump. End of story.

As for your 1996 clip of Australian violence by people who were wrong in what they done, and should have known better. A typical ploy of the forum extreme, finding one wrong to justify a wrong they agree with. Unlike myself and others on the Forum who support the right of peaceful protest, but condemn ALL forms of violent behaviour.

No matter what Trump says after the event, it was he who encouraged his fascists supporters to rally in Washington, the so called special people he loves, it was he who encouraged the same fascists red necked racists to attempt to pervert the democratic process. It is Trump who should be charged along with his violent supporters.