Foxy,

"I gave specific examples..."

Well you actually didn't. You adopted a policy you've used before which is to vaguely point at some past post and assert it makes your point without ever showing how it does. You probably think it works. You're wrong.

Put the exact quote here as to where I infringed "freedom of speech".

SR,

You addressed the post to me and raised Obama as a deflection. You also claimed I was blaming the victim, which is patently untrue....unless you think Biden's the victim!

I've noticed SR, that whenever you put up something that's long on vitriol and short on facts, you throw in a departing ad hom. Its a dead give-away. But I won't reciprocate...one of us has to be mature.

More on the MSM bias:

Biden has been interviewed 16 times since the story broke. Always by friendly media. Not one question on Reade.
All 5 purported VP candidates were interviewed on the weekend. Not one question on Reade.

Foxy's stance explained in one picture....

http://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9c88c6730bd9294a7616b590b760161a2a67cb5ec1765c1a752ef0cedb1f3c96.jpg

mhaze,

I quoted from your own post on page 4.

Go back and read it.

Perhaps you shall have a light bulb moment.

And see things from another's point of view.

One can only hope.

BTW:

I loved the link. Seen it earlier.

It could have read - "Was it the current President
or a past President?

Ör a wannabe President?

Dear mhaze,

Your response to Kavanaugh's accuser was;

“The whole thing was designed to destroy a good man's life and that of his family for crass political advantage.”

Here you aren't in any way empathetic to what the victim may have gone through, your only beef is that the 'left' aren't falling to your depths.

That fits with blaming the victim in my book.

As to Obama and Sanders the point I was making is that these men were not accused of anything. Clinton, Trump, Biden, have had multiple accusers. This evidently isn't a default thing with leadership and generally there will have been substantial rumours before anything becomes public since newspapers will need to be sure they are substantive enough to commit to publishing.

I have little doubt that the three of them are likely guilty, as was Kavanaugh.

So would you apply your same sentiment ““The whole thing was designed to destroy a good man's life and that of his family for crass political advantage.” to Biden's situation or not.

SR,

Either way, some evidence would be necessary. In relation to Biden's case, if the accuser reported the alleged offence very soon after it was alleged to happen, confided in someone, had a medical examination, or if there were other pieces of material evidence, that would all boost her case. But without evidence, no matter how believable her story, she may not have much chance of success.

The same would go for Trumpf. I'm sure that, as a repulsive turd of a human being, he has committed multiple offences of every sort, but even so, evidence would have to be produced to convict him. The fact that he has paid off numerous women, and his remarks about 'grabbing pussy', suggest that he has indeed committed such offences. His sense of entitlement, as a rich bully from birth, add to the likelihood that he thought he was above the law in these sorts of crimes.

Joe