Foxy,

Then explain to me how Kavanagh's accuser, a staunch democrat, can make a claim yet not remember a single salient detail about where it happened, when it happened or a single other person that went to the "party", yet you claim that she was a credible witness?

Perhaps you have a different definition of credible or you are so biased you walk in circles?

Foxy wrote:"Kavanagh lost it in court which worried so many people.
He was not credible - and should not have received
his judicial position. His testimony was full of holes.
Utterly unbelievable. Do some research and get the facts.
The man was a drunk and partied all the time. His accuser
was credible."

That's quite possibly the wrongest paragraph ever written on this site.

I'll do you a favour and tell you how to reconcile your hypocritical stances. This is from Gloria Steinem, who when confronted with the same ethical dilemma as you (ie lack of ethics) said she believes Reade, thinks Biden is a rapist but will vote for him anyway because OrangeManBad. So not ethical, dripping with hypocrisy, but at least honest. (As Meatloaf almost said, One out of three ain't bad).







As to Biden, the moves to push the silly old duffer aside are growing daily. Its difficult to think that the DNC are so clueless as to allow him to go up against Trump. But they're running out of options. That they are now reconsidering letting Hillary have another go shows just how bare the cupboard is.

mhaze,

I'm not as fixated about this topic as you appear
to be.

Have you run out of topics to discuss?

BTW: Gloria Steinem never impressed me.

Neither did Germaine Greer.(early days - maybe).

Find a more interesting female to quote if you
want to impress.