The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Believe some women

Believe some women

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
Hi Joe (Loudmouth),

Thanks. I've read Michelle Obama's book
(got given it as a birthday present a while back).
She'd be great - but she wasn't one of the candidates.
Neither was Candace Owens of course.

Kamala Harris was. Hence my suggestion.

Maybe Biden could have Kamala as a running mate and
Michelle could run next time?

A bit of wishful thinking here.
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 28 April 2020 6:15:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There are a couple of issues here.

1 The media

This episode displays, for even the dullest of minds, that the legacy media are utterly biased toward the left. Organisations who some here have referred to as 'reputable' have displayed complete contempt for any notion of consistency or even-handedness. Places like the NYT, who published any and every accusation against Kavanaugh as though they were indisputable truths have been reluctant to even mention these accusations and have treated them as anything but the truth. Organisations that hid data that showed that accusers were lying, now hide data that supports the accuser. Organisations that deemed #BelieveAllWomen as being the only moral attitude, now publish Biden's denials as though they are the end of the matter.

I'm sure those who don't care for the truth and who just want to be told what to believe will continue to think of these left-wing mouth-pieces as 'reputable'. But perhaps in the back of their minds, in those places where the truth still gets an airing, they'll know that they are lying to themselves.

Defenders of the ABC will often ask for evidence of bias in the reports the ABC makes. But much of the ABC bias is in what it chooses to not tell its brethren.
Search the ABC website and you'll find dozens of stories on Stormy Daniels, pretty much all favouring her and attacking Trump. Search on Blassey Ford and, likewise you'll find dozens of stories attacking Kavanaugh. Search on Tara Reade....crickets.

That's what bias looks like.
Posted by mhaze, Wednesday, 29 April 2020 10:53:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
mhaze, these allegations were covered on the ABC's Planet America. http://iview.abc.net.au/show/planet-america
15/4/20 episode, eighteen and a half minutes in.
(Hurry, it won't be up there for much longer - but that's not due to bias)
Posted by Aidan, Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:13:53 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
My comment on Candace Owen was a joke!

One thing in favour of Kamala Harris is that, unlike most Democrats, she can lie straight in bed..... http://www.independentsentinel.com/its-confirmed-kamala-harris-slept-her-way-to-the-top/

________________________________________________________________

Its hardly worth my while to go back and dredge up all the comments from Foxy, Paul et al during our discussions on Pell, Kavanaugh and Trump showing them adopting highly moralistic positions, getting the vapours over any inclination to disbelieve the 'survivors'. Even when presented with their utterly different stance on those earlier issues we'd get the standard ' when I said it was red, I meant it was black, and how dare you say I didn't know it was blue' response.

When Trump talked about touching women, it was treated as career-ending revelations.
When Kavanaugh was saddled with entirely unsupported accusations, it was considered enough to disqualify him.
But now we have thoroughly collaborated accusations and they're merely examples of 'boys will be boys'.

Truly it is said that if it wasn't for double standards the left would have no standards at all.

You'd hope that at least this would bring to an end the whole #believeallwomen rubbish. But it won't. The next time a bloke on the right even looks side-ways at a woman, it'll be treated as a civilisation ending event and all this Biden excusing will be quickly forgotten.

Still, again, somewhere in the recesses of their mind, surely these people understand their utter hypocrisy.
Posted by mhaze, Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:18:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
mhaze,

Well said.

And totally without bias. (wink).
Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:29:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mhaze,

If Biden can be shown to have indecently assaulted a staff member, then he should pay the penalty.

If Trump can be shown to have 'grabbed a woman on the pussy' without her consent, i. e. indecent assault, then he should also pay the penalty. But is that likely to happen ? Won't the good ol' boys guffaw and cavort and - if they could - pat him heartily on the back ? A real guy ?

If either Biden or Trump have committed indecent assault on women, then they are both worthless turds. I'm sure you would agree (sarcasm).

Joe
Posted by loudmouth2, Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:54:22 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy