What an idiotic think to say.
SteeleRedux,
Really ? Think about your idiotic reply to Hasbeen !

Dear individual,

Well here is my reply to him;

"So a couple of French scientists get called out by WHO for wanting to test their vaccines on Africans rather than their own citizens and you want to inject WHO staff as a consequence of their temerity?

Any idea how sick that sounds?"

You first claimed it was sick and now it is apparently idiotic.

Why is it idiotic in your eyes?

SteelRedux,
That's what Hasbeen said & he is right ! You're the sick one for not supporting him !

Nah, how about we inject the 10 highest paid people in the world health organisation, then infect them to see if it works. At least the useless bunch would have done something useful for once in their privileged lives.

If the first one doesn't work, then move to the top floor of the UN for further tests, & make those bludgers of some use just once.

SR,

"You have got some second hand quote from it which is fine but I have been following this site for a while now and seen the figures adjust as States up their isolation protocols."

Firstly, it wasn't "some second hand quote", it was from Brix. Look her up and then ponder how idiotic your assertion was.

You are claiming that the constant reductions in the scary numbers from this healthdata site is due to changing mitigation actions. But its rubbish.

On 31 March healthdata were projecting that the number of beds needs for Wuhan virus suffers by 5 April would be 179267. But on 5 April they reduced that to 90353. What massively increased mitigation efforts caused the halving?

There weren't any and therefore your assertions are out the window. The reason for the cuts in projections/guesses is that new and better data was fed into the models and new and better forecasts came out. LOWER forecasts.

Even after those adjustments they were still out by almost 300% once the true figures came through.

Your assertions are rubbish SR. But I won't bother to wait around for an acknowledgement of that. After all, this is so complex and you are so accomplished at muddying the water to hide error, that it'll be child's play for you to avoid any sort of honesty.

I've been at pains to avoid blaming any governments for taking actions which, in the light of day and with a fuller understand of the overall problem, seem precipitous.

Decisions had to be made and medical bureaucracies all around the world were crying 'wolf'. Governments had little choice but to act as they did, although some didn't and seem to be the better for going down a different path.

But overnight we had the Australian government start to release details about the modelling that underpinned their decisions.

* The models weren't based on Australian conditions.
* The data plugged into those models was based, primarily, on data from China.

From China!! The only country who we know has lied about all aspects of the virus from the time they first identified it, and their (fake) data is what we use to inform our decisions.

As he was making the explanations, you had the feeling Morrison was standing there wondering how it got to the point where he had to make such admissions. Looking foolish doesn't go close to describing it.

Yet here we are and there's no going back.

But there are options going forward and one is to start opening the economy as soon as the Easter break is over. But our leaders won't take that option. The politics are such that, were they to do so, they'd be blamed for every death thereafter and salvaging something from the economic wreak isn't worth that type of publicity

could not help but laugh at Nicholas Reece insisting the Government release the modelling used in order for them to make decisions. He obviously forgot how Labour/Greens were about to totally destroy the economy based on the gw myth and refused to show any modelling. I am just hoping the data used for modelling is not nearly as corrupt as the gw thieves have used in scamming the public.