Stanford University’s Pat Frank in a paper titled ‘Propagation of Error and the Reliability of Global Air Temperature Projections’ argues that warmist climate modellers are more notable for arrogance than accuracy:

Climate modellers are not trained in the scientific method. They are not trained to be scientists. They are not scientists. They are not trained to evaluate the physical or predictive reliability of their own models.

"Subjectivist narratives and academic critical theories are prejudicial constructs. They are in opposition to science and reason" .

Dear individual,

The top fire officer I quoted is the former head of the Queensland fire services. He started his firefighting career at the ripe old age of 21 and had over 3 decades of experience at all levels of the service.

He was not a 'management type' parachuted in but is a well respected and highly experienced fireman.

And you want to piss all over that effort with you little snide remarks.

Well bully for you mate.

SteeleRedux,
Career being the operative word !

Well some of the things posted here are pure nonsense, some is just a little mad
Not sure, know once it was said, by some one worth taking notice of,*we say dreadful things about one another here*
That has got worse
AND SHEDDING CONTRIBUTORS SEEMS PROOF
so what? so what if others have different view? is that reason to dump on them

Well bully for you mate.
SteeleRedux,
Shouldn't these magnificent heroes be out fighting fires instead of parading behind Premiers ?

Everything individual says about the clowns parading in uniforms more appropriate to a South American dictator is true. The good guys are the volunteers who actually fight fires.